Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24526064›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer research : MCR2014

EZH2: not EZHY (easy) to deal.

Gauri Deb, Anup Kumar Singh, Sanjay Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Retrospective analysis on the consistency of MRI features with histological and molecular markers in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG).Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gauri DebAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Urology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center; 2Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University; 3Division of General Medical Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; 4Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam; and 5Biochemistry Division, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anup Kumar Singh
Sanjay Gupta

Funding

Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention by ApigeninR01CA108512 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, SANJAY · 2004 to 2014
$2.4M
Molecular Mechanisms of GSTP1 Reactivation by Green Tea PolyphenolsR01CA115491 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, SANJAY · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Reactivation of GSTP1 Gene by Green Tea PolyphenolsR21CA109424 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, SANJAY · 2004 to 2005
$252k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108512NCI NIH HHS R01CA108512NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115491NCI NIH HHS R01CA115491NCI NIH HHS R21 CA109424PHS HHS R21109424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seminal discoveries have established that epigenetic modifications are important for driving tumor progression. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are highly conserved epigenetic effectors that maintain, by posttranslational modification of histones, the silenced state of genes involved in critical biologic processes, including cellular development, stem cell plasticity, and tumor progression. PcG proteins are found in two multimeric protein complexes called Polycomb repressive complexes: PRC1 and PRC2. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), catalytic core subunit of PRC2, epigenetically silences several tumor-suppressor genes by catalyzing the trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27, which serves as a docking site for DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases. Evidence suggests that overexpression of EZH2 is strongly associated with cancer progression and poor outcome in disparate cancers, including hematologic and epithelial malignancies. The regulatory circuit and molecular cues causing EZH2 deregulation vary in different cancer types. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive overview on the oncogenic role of EZH2 during tumorigenesis and highlights the multifaceted role of EZH2, as either a transcriptional activator or repressor depending on the cellular context. Additional insight is provided on the recent understanding of the causes and consequences of EZH2 overexpression in specific cancer types. Finally, evidence is discussed on how EZH2 has emerged as a promising target in anticancer therapy and the prospects for targeting EZH2 without affecting global methylation status. Thus, a better understanding of the complex epigenetic regulatory network controlling EZH2 expression and target genes facilitates the design of novel therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticEnhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 ProteinEZH2 protein, humanPolycomb Repressive Complex 2

Identifiers

PMID24526064
PMCPMC4020974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.