Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24525778›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Immunogenicity of DNA- and recombinant protein-based Alzheimer disease epitope vaccines.

Hayk Davtyan, Andrew Bacon, Irina Petrushina, Karen Zagorski, David H Cribbs, Anahit Ghochikyan, Michael G Agadjanyan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial viruses: A nanotechnology based approach.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Precision pharmacology for Alzheimer's disease.Pharmacological research · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hayk DavtyanDepartment of Molecular Immunology; Institute for Molecular Medicine; Huntington Beach, CA USA.
Andrew BaconXenetic Biosciences, PLC; London, UK.
Irina PetrushinaInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders; University of California at Irvine; Irvine, CA USA.
Karen ZagorskiDepartment of Molecular Immunology; Institute for Molecular Medicine; Huntington Beach, CA USA.
David H CribbsInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders; University of California at Irvine; Irvine, CA USA; Department of Neurology; University of California at Irvine; Irvine, CA USA.
Anahit GhochikyanDepartment of Molecular Immunology; Institute for Molecular Medicine; Huntington Beach, CA USA.
Michael G AgadjanyanDepartment of Molecular Immunology; Institute for Molecular Medicine; Huntington Beach, CA USA; Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders; University of California at Irvine; Irvine, CA USA.

Funding

UC Irvine Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell CoreP50AG016573 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LAFERLA, FRANK M · 2000 to 2019
$37.0M
Combining AD Epitope Vaccine with Innate ImmunityR01NS050895 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AGADJANYAN, MICHAEL G, CRIBBS, DAVID HASTINGS · 2004 to 2018
$7.4M
Multiple Approaches to Abeta Vaccination in Animal ModelsR01AG020241 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AGADJANYAN, MICHAEL G, CRIBBS, DAVID HASTINGS · 2001 to 2016
$5.6M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG16573NIA NIH HHS R01-AG020241NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS050895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) process involves the accumulation of amyloid plaques and tau tangles in the brain, nevertheless the attempts at targeting the main culprits, neurotoxic β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides, have thus far proven unsuccessful for improving cognitive function. Important lessons about anti-Aβ immunotherapeutic strategies were learned from the first active vaccination clinical trials. AD progression could be safely prevented or delayed if the vaccine (1) induces high titers of antibodies specific to toxic forms of Aβ; (2) does not activate the harmful autoreactive T cells that may induce inflammation; (3) is initiated before or at least at the early stages of the accumulation of toxic forms of Aβ. Data from the recent passive vaccination trials with bapineuzumab and solanezumab also indicated that anti-Aβ immunotherapy might be effective in reduction of the AD pathology and even improvement of cognitive and/or functional performance in patients when administered early in the course of the disease. For the prevention of AD the active immunization strategy may be more desirable than passive immunotherapy protocol and it can offer the potential for sustainable clinical and commercial advantages. Here we discuss the active vaccine approaches, which are still in preclinical development and vaccines that are already in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAlzheimer VaccinesAnimalsEpitopesHumansImmunogenetic PhenomenaRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, DNAAlzheimer VaccinesEpitopesRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, DNAadjuvantsAlzheimer diseaseDNA vaccineelectroporationimmune responsesliposome-based vaccinationprotein vaccine

Identifiers

PMID24525778
PMCPMC4896595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.