Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24525754›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2014

Capturing and cultivating single bacterial cells in gel microdroplets to obtain near-complete genomes.

Armand E K Dichosa, Ashlynn R Daughton, Krista G Reitenga, Michael S Fitzsimons, Cliff S Han

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Panel 3: Genomics, precision medicine and targeted therapies.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2020
    Review
  9. Development of Anti-ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Armand E K DichosaGenome Science Programs, B-11 Bioenergy and Biome Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Ashlynn R DaughtonGenome Science Programs, B-11 Bioenergy and Biome Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Krista G ReitengaGenome Science Programs, B-11 Bioenergy and Biome Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
Michael S Fitzsimons1] Genome Science Programs, B-11 Bioenergy and Biome Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA. [2].
Cliff S HanGenome Science Programs, B-11 Bioenergy and Biome Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assembling a complete genome from a single bacterial cell, termed single-cell genomics, is challenging with current technologies. Recovery rates of complete genomes from fragmented assemblies of single-cell templates significantly vary. Although increasing the amount of genomic template material by standard cultivation improves recovery, most bacteria are unfortunately not amenable to traditional cultivation, possibly owing to the lack of unidentified, yet necessary, growth signals and/or specific symbiotic influences. To overcome this limitation, we adopted and modified the method of cocultivation of single-captured bacterial cells in gel microdroplets (GMDs) to improve full genomic sequence recovery. By completing multiple genomes of two novel species derived from single cells, we demonstrated its efficacy on diverse bacterial species using human oral and gut microbiome samples. Here we describe a detailed protocol for capturing single bacterial cells, cocultivating them in medium and isolating microcolonies in GMDs with flow cytometry. Beginning with preliminary studies, obtaining GMDs with single microcolonies for whole-genome amplification may take ∼4 weeks.

Indexed as

GelsBacteriaFlow CytometryGastrointestinal TractGenome, BacterialGenomicsHumansMouthSingle-Cell AnalysisGels

Identifiers

PMID24525754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.