Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24525628›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2014

Patterns of opioid utilization in pregnancy in a large cohort of commercial insurance beneficiaries in the United States.

Brian T Bateman, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, James P Rathmell, John D Seeger, Michael Doherty, Michael A Fischer, Krista F Huybrechts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Randomized pilot study comparing standard vs high-calorie feeding in infants with Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian T BatemanFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (B.T.B.); Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (S.H.-D.); Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.P.R.); and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.D.S., M.D., M.A.F., K.F.H.).
Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
James P Rathmell
John D Seeger
Michael Doherty
Michael A Fischer
Krista F Huybrechts

Funding

Improved methods to assess the comparative safety of new psychiatric medicationsK01MH099141 · NIMH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUYBRECHTS, KRISTA F · 2013 to 2017
$882k
Comparative safety & effectiveness of antihypertensive medications in pregnancyK08HD075831 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BATEMAN, BRIAN THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$717k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD075831NICHD NIH HHS K08HD075831NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH099141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few data regarding the utilization of opioids during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to define the prevalence and patterns of opioid use in a large cohort of pregnant women who were commercial insurance beneficiaries.

methodsData for the study were derived from a deidentified research database of women from across the United States who had both medical and prescription benefits. By using diagnostic codes, the authors defined a cohort of 534,500 women with completed pregnancies who were enrolled in a commercial insurance plan from 6 months before pregnancy through delivery.

resultsOverall, 76,742 women (14.4%) were dispensed an opioid at some point during pregnancy. There were 30,566 women (5.7%) dispensed an opioid during the first trimester, 30,434 women (5.7%) during the second trimester, and 34,906 women (6.5%) during the third trimester. Of these, 11,747 women (2.2%) were dispensed opioids three or more times during pregnancy. The most commonly dispensed opioids during pregnancy were hydrocodone (6.8%), codeine (6.1%), and oxycodone (2.0%). The prevalence of exposure at anytime during pregnancy decreased slightly during the study period from 14.9% for pregnancies that delivered in 2005 to 12.9% in 2011. The prevalence of exposure varied significantly by region and was lowest in the Northeast and highest in the South.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that opioids are very common exposures during pregnancy. Given the small and inconsistent body of literature on their safety in pregnancy, these findings suggest a need for research in this area.

Indexed as

PregnancyAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInsurance BenefitsInsurance, HealthPrevalenceUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID24525628
PMCPMC3999216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.