Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24525545›Full record

Observational studyJAMA ophthalmology2014

Trial end points and natural history in patients with G11778A Leber hereditary optic neuropathy : preparation for gene therapy clinical trial.

Byron L Lam, William J Feuer, Joyce C Schiffman, Vittorio Porciatti, Ruth Vandenbroucke, Potyra R Rosa, Giovanni Gregori, John Guy

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Capturing the experiences of patients with inherited optic neuropathies: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative studies.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Byron L LamBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
William J FeuerBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Joyce C SchiffmanBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Vittorio PorciattiBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Ruth VandenbrouckeBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Potyra R RosaBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Giovanni GregoriBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
John GuyBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
University of Miami · US

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Victor L Perez · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: Gene Therapy TrialR24EY018600 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GUY, JOHN · 2008 to 2012
$5.1M
REVERSIBLE GANGLION CELL DYSFUNCTION IN GLAUCOMAR01EY014957 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PORCIATTI, VITTORIO · 2005 to 2017
$4.3M
RETINAL GANGLION CELL PLASTICITY IN GLAUCOMAR01EY019077 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PORCIATTI, VITTORIO · 2009 to 2015
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801NEI NIH HHS P30-EY014801NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014957NEI NIH HHS R01EY014957NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019077NEI NIH HHS R24 EY018600NEI NIH HHS R24EY018600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Establishing the natural history of G11778A Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is important to determine the optimal end points to assess the safety and efficacy of a planned gene therapy trial. OBJECTIVE To use the results of the present natural history study of patients with G11778A LHON to plan a gene therapy clinical trial that will use allotopic expression by delivering a normal nuclear-encoded ND4 gene into the nuclei of retinal ganglion cells via an adeno-associated virus vector injected into the vitreous. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective observational study initiated in 2008 was conducted in primary and referral institutional practice settings. Participants included 44 individuals with G11778A LHON, recruited between September 2008 and March 2012, who were evaluated every 6 months and returned for 1 or more follow-up visits (6-36 months) as of August 2012. EXPOSURES Complete neuro-ophthalmic examination and main measures. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Visual acuity, automated visual field testing, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. RESULTS Clinical measures were stable during the follow-up period, and visual acuity was as good as or better than the other visual factors used for monitoring patients. Based on a criterion of 15 or more letters from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, 13 eyes of 8 patients (18%) improved, but 24 months after the onset of symptoms, any further improvements were to no better than 20/100. Acuity recovery occurred in some patients despite continued marked retinal nerve fiber layer thinning indistinguishable from that in patients who did not recover visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Spontaneous improvement of visual acuity in patients with G11778A LHON is not common and is partial and limited when it occurs, so improvements in vision with adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapy of a synthetic wild-type ND4 subunit gene should be possible to detect with a reasonable sample size. Visual acuity appears to be the most suitable primary end point for the planned clinical trial.

Indexed as

Endpoint DeterminationGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsAdolescentAdultChildClinical Trials as TopicDependovirusDNA, MitochondrialDNA Mutational AnalysisElectroretinographyFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedDNA, MitochondrialNADH DehydrogenaseNADH dehydrogenase subunit 4

Identifiers

PMID24525545
PMCPMC4266137
OpenAlexW2054303973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.