Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24525140›Full record

GuidelineMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2014

Antibody validation of immunohistochemistry for biomarker discovery: recommendations of a consortium of academic and pharmaceutical based histopathology researchers.

William J Howat, Arthur Lewis, Phillipa Jones, Caroline Kampf, Fredrik Pontén, Chris M van der Loos, Neil Gray, Chris Womack, Anthony Warford

Open access · hybridAbstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MRE11 as a Predictive Biomarker of Outcome After Radiation Therapy in Bladder Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. January in focus in HCB: antibody validation.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Immunohistochemical analysis of expression of VEGFR2, KIT, PDGFR-β, and CDK4 in canine urothelial carcinoma.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

William J HowatCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK. Electronic address: will.howat@cruk.cam.ac.uk.
Arthur LewisMedImmune, Granta Park, Cambridge, UK.
Phillipa JonesUCL Advanced Diagnostics, 21 University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK.
Caroline KampfDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Fredrik PonténDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Chris M van der LoosDepartment of Pathology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neil GrayAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Macclesfield, UK.
Chris WomackAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Macclesfield, UK.
Anthony WarfordUniversity of Westminster, London, UK.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBUppsala University · SEAcademic Medical Center · NLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Westminster · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As biomarker discovery takes centre-stage, the role of immunohistochemistry within that process is increasing. At the same time, the number of antibodies being produced for "research use" continues to rise and it is important that antibodies to be used as biomarkers are validated for specificity and sensitivity before use. This guideline seeks to provide a stepwise approach for the validation of an antibody for immunohistochemical assays, reflecting the views of a consortium of academic and pharmaceutical based histopathology researchers. We propose that antibodies are placed into a tier system, level 1-3, based on evidence of their usage in immunohistochemistry, and that the degree of validation required is proportionate to their place on that tier.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorBiomedical ResearchCell LineChemistry, PharmaceuticalEpitopesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasmsPhenotypeProteinsReproducibility of ResultsRNA, MessengerAntibodiesBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorEpitopesProteinsRNA, MessengerAntibody validationBiomarkerGuidelinesHistopathologyImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID24525140
PMCPMC4240800
OpenAlexW1965310085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.