ArticleAmerican journal of public health2014
Same strategy different industry: corporate influence on public policy.
Article in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Perceptions of Arguments in Support of Policies to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption Among Low-Income White, Black and Latinx Parents of Young Children.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2022Article
- Food Industry Donations to Academic Programs: A Cross-Sectional Examination of the Extent of Publicly Available Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The politics of voluntary self-regulation: insights from the development and promotion of the Australian Beverages Council'sPublic health nutrition · 2020Article
- Online tobacco marketing among US adolescent sexual, gender, racial, and ethnic minorities.Addictive behaviors · 2019Article
- Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018Article
- Big Food's Ambivalence: Seeking Profit and Responsibility for Health.American journal of public health · 2017Article
- Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change.Public health nutrition · 2016Review
- Evaluation of the Evidence Base for the Alcohol Industry's Actions to Reduce Drink Driving Globally.American journal of public health · 2016Article
- News Media Framing of New York City's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Portion-Size Cap.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Is Sugar the new Tobacco? Insights from Laboratory Studies, Consumer Surveys and Public Health.Current obesity reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In March 2013 a state judge invalidated New York City's proposal to ban sales of sugar-sweetened beverages larger than 16 ounces; the case is under appeal. This setback was attributable in part to opposition from the beverage industry and racial/ethnic minority organizations they support. We provide lessons from similar tobacco industry efforts to block policies that reduced smoking prevalence. We offer recommendations that draw on the tobacco control movement's success in thwarting industry influence and promoting public health policies that hold promise to improve population health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.