Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24524521›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2014

A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention.

Greg J Huang, Joana Cunha-Cruz, Marilynn Rothen, Charles Spiekerman, Mark Drangsholt, Loren Anderson, Gayle A Roset

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03512769 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Restful Jaw Device: A New Way to Support and Protect the Jaw During Third Molar Extractions; Feasibility

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2018 to 2018Enrolled19ConditionsImpacted Third Molar Tooth, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction SyndromeArmsRestful Jaw Device
NCT03975920 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Restful Jaw Device: A New Way to Support and Protect the Jaw During Third Molar Extractions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2019 to 2021Enrolled180ConditionsImpacted Third Molar Tooth, Temporomandibular DisorderArmsThe Restful Jaw Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. An interview with Greg J. Huang.Dental press journal of orthodontics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Greg J HuangGreg J. Huang is with the Department of Orthodontics, Joana Cunha-Cruz and Charles Spiekerman are with the Department of Oral Health Sciences, Marilynn Rothen is with Regional Clinical Dental Research Center, and Mark Drangsholt is with the Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle. Loren Anderson is in private practice, Kennewick, WA. Gayle A. Roset is in private practice, Billings, MT.
Joana Cunha-Cruz
Marilynn Rothen
Charles Spiekerman
Mark Drangsholt
Loren Anderson
Gayle A Roset
Institute for Urban and Regional Research · AT

Funding

Network Chair for the Pacific Northwest DPBRNU01DE016750 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEROUEN, TIMOTHY A · 2005 to 2011
$11.1M
Data Coordinating Center for the Pacific Northwest DPBRNU01DE016752 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEROUX, BRIAN GILBERT · 2005 to 2011
$6.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE016750NIDCR NIH HHS DE016752NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016750NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe investigated outcomes of third molar removal or retention in adolescents and young adults.

methodsWe recruited patients aged 16 to 22 years from a dental practice-based research network in the Pacific Northwest from May 2009 through September 2010 who had at least 1 third molar present and had never undergone third molar removal. Data were acquired via questionnaire and clinical examination at baseline, periodic online questionnaires, and clinical examination at 24 months.

resultsA total of 801 patients participated. Among patients undergoing third molar removal, rates of paresthesia and jaw joint symptoms lasting more than 1 month were 6.3 and 34.3 per 100 person-years, respectively. Among patients not undergoing removal, corresponding rates were 0.7 and 8.8. Periodontal attachment loss at distal sites of second molars did not significantly differ by third molar removal status. Incident caries at the distal surfaces of second molars occurred in fewer than 1% of all sites.

conclusionsRates of paresthesia and temporomandibular joint disorder were higher after third molar removal. Periodontal attachment loss and incident caries at the distal sites of second molars were not affected by extraction status.

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMolar, ThirdNorthwestern United StatesParesthesiaProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTooth ExtractionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24524521
PMCPMC4025699
OpenAlexW2007078662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.