ReviewClinics in perinatology2014
Fault and blame, insults to the perinatal brain may be remote from time of birth.
Review in Clinics in perinatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinguishing Laterality in Brain Injury in Rabbit Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Novel Volume Rendering Techniques.Developmental neuroscience · 2025Article
- Mutations disrupting neuritogenesis genes confer risk for cerebral palsy.Nature genetics · 2020Article
- Delayed intranasal infusion of human amnion epithelial cells improves white matter maturation after asphyxia in preterm fetal sheep.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019Article
- Waking up too early - the consequences of preterm birth on sleep development.The Journal of physiology · 2018Review
- Evolving changes in fetal heart rate variability and brain injury after hypoxia-ischaemia in preterm fetal sheep.The Journal of physiology · 2018Article
- The fetus at the tipping point: modifying the outcome of fetal asphyxia.The Journal of physiology · 2018Review
- Sex, drugs and rock and roll: tales from preterm fetal life.The Journal of physiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
There is a certainty in malpractice cases that neurodevelopmental deficits are caused by preventable events at birth when the onset, nature, and timing of the insult in the antenatal and natal period are unknown. The biggest problem is determining timing. Electronic fetal monitoring is given excessive importance in legal cases. Before assigning fault on events at birth, a better understanding of developmental neurobiology and limitations of the present clinical biomarkers is warranted. The issues of single versus repeated episodes, timing of antenatal insults, pros and cons of legal arguments, interaction of various etiologic and anatomic factors are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.