Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523853›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Ablation of the proapoptotic genes CHOP or Ask1 does not prevent or delay loss of visual function in a P23H transgenic mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa.

Adeseye Adekeye, Mohammad Haeri, Eduardo Solessio, Barry E Knox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rhodopsin Oligomerization and Aggregation.The Journal of membrane biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adeseye AdekeyeDepartments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Mohammad HaeriDepartments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Eduardo SolessioDepartments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
Barry E KnoxDepartments of Neuroscience & Physiology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology, Center for Vision Research, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, United States of America.
SUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

STRUCTURE/FUNCTION OF SHORT WAVELENGTH VISUAL PIGMENTSR01EY011256 · NEI · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI KNOX, BARRY E · 1997 to 2011
$2.6M
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF PHOTORECEPTOR FUNCTIONR01EY012975 · NEI · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI KNOX, BARRY E · 2000 to 2010
$2.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY-11256NEI NIH HHS EY-12975NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011256NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The P23H mutation in rhodopsin (Rho(P23H)) is a prevalent cause of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. We examined the role of the ER stress proteins, Chop and Ask1, in regulating the death of rod photoreceptors in a mouse line harboring the Rho(P23H) rhodopsin transgene (GHL(+)). We used knockout mice models to determine whether Chop and Ask1 regulate rod survival or retinal degeneration. Electrophysiological recordings showed similar retinal responses and sensitivities for GHL(+), GHL(+)/Chop(-/-) and GHL(+)/Ask1(-/-) animals between 4-28 weeks, by which time all three mouse lines exhibited severe loss of retinal function. Histologically, ablation of Chop and Ask1 did not rescue photoreceptor loss in young animals. However, in older mice, a regional protective effect was observed in the central retina of GHL(+)/Chop(-/-) and GHL(+)/Ask1(-/-), a region that was severely degenerated in GHL(+) mice. Our results show that in the presence of the Rho(P23H) transgene, the rate of decline in retinal sensitivity is similar in Chop or Ask1 ablated and wild-type retinas, suggesting that these proteins do not play a major role during the acute phase of photoreceptor loss in GHL(+) mice. Instead they may be involved in regulating secondary pathological responses such as inflammation that are upregulated during later stages of disease progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisDisease Models, AnimalElectrophysiologyElectroretinographyGenotypeMAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 5MiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicPhotophobiaRetinaRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRetinitis PigmentosaRhodopsinDdit3 protein, mouseMap3k5 protein, mouseMAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 5RhodopsinTranscription Factor CHOP

Identifiers

PMID24523853
PMCPMC3921110
OpenAlexW2041387803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.