Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523828›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2014

Automatic identification of motion artifacts in EHG recording for robust analysis of uterine contractions.

Yiyao Ye-Lin, Javier Garcia-Casado, Gema Prats-Boluda, José Alberola-Rubio, Alfredo Perales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram and exploring the best electrode combination.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiyao Ye-LinGrupo de Bioelectrónica (I3BH), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n Ed.8B, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Javier Garcia-CasadoGrupo de Bioelectrónica (I3BH), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n Ed.8B, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1410-2721
Gema Prats-BoludaGrupo de Bioelectrónica (I3BH), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n Ed.8B, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9362-5055
José Alberola-RubioGrupo de Bioelectrónica (I3BH), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n Ed.8B, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Alfredo PeralesServicio de Obstetricia, H. U. La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrohysterography (EHG) is a noninvasive technique for monitoring uterine electrical activity. However, the presence of artifacts in the EHG signal may give rise to erroneous interpretations and make it difficult to extract useful information from these recordings. The aim of this work was to develop an automatic system of segmenting EHG recordings that distinguishes between uterine contractions and artifacts. Firstly, the segmentation is performed using an algorithm that generates the TOCO-like signal derived from the EHG and detects windows with significant changes in amplitude. After that, these segments are classified in two groups: artifacted and nonartifacted signals. To develop a classifier, a total of eleven spectral, temporal, and nonlinear features were calculated from EHG signal windows from 12 women in the first stage of labor that had previously been classified by experts. The combination of characteristics that led to the highest degree of accuracy in detecting artifacts was then determined. The results showed that it is possible to obtain automatic detection of motion artifacts in segmented EHG recordings with a precision of 92.2% using only seven features. The proposed algorithm and classifier together compose a useful tool for analyzing EHG signals and would help to promote clinical applications of this technique.

Indexed as

Uterine ContractionAlgorithmsArtifactsElectromyographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLabor, ObstetricModels, StatisticalMotionPattern Recognition, AutomatedPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24523828
PMCPMC3912778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.