Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523780›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2013

The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries.

Najmeh Maharlouei, Abbas Rezaianzadeh, Elham Hesami, Fariba Moradi, Ezat Mazloomi, Hassan Joulaei, Mohammad Khodayari, Kamran B Lankarani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Factors Affecting Exclusive Breastfeeding, Using Adaptive LASSO Regression.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What is Turkish women's opinion about vaginal delivery?Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Najmeh MaharloueiHealth Policy Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abbas RezaianzadehDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Hygiene and Nutrition, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Elham HesamiFamily Health Unit, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fariba MoradiFamily Health Unit, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ezat MazloomiFamily Health Unit, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hassan JoulaeiHealth Policy Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad KhodayariHealth Policy Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kamran B LankaraniHealth Policy Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cesarean section (C-section) has higher risk compared to normal vaginal delivery (NVD). The aim of this population-based study was to evaluate the frequency of mothers' tendency toward the mode of delivery and the factors that can affect this inclination. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2011 to June 2012 in Fars Province, Iran, and comprised mothers in their 20(th) to 30(th) weeks of pregnancy. A questionnaire was designed to include, sociodemographic information, maternal knowledge, main sources of knowledge, attitude of the mother, husband, parents, close friends, and gynecologist, regarding the route of delivery, convenience factors, and barriers to choosing NVD, and mother's preference for the route of delivery.

resultsOf 6921 participants, 2197 (31.7%) preferred C-section and 4308 (62.2%) favored NVD while 416 (6%) had no idea regarding the preferred route of delivery. Score of knowledge in 904 (13.1%) participants was zero, and 1261 women (18.2%) achieved an acceptable level of knowledge. Using binary logistic regression, positive history of previous abortion and/or infertility, higher education level of mother and husband, mother's unacceptable level of knowledge regarding complications of C-section, and mother's and husband's positive attitude toward C-section were determinant factors in choosing C-section as a preferred route of delivery.

conclusionAppropriate measures should be taken to raise awareness and knowledge of mothers and all families about complications of the C-section. Establishment of clinics for painless NVD and assuring mothers of benefits and lower complications of NVD can reduce the tendency for C-sections.

Indexed as

Attitudebarriercesarean sectionknowledgenormal vaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID24523780
PMCPMC3906784
OpenAlexW2172061037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.