Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2013

Using structural neuroimaging to make quantitative predictions of symptom progression in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Stefania Tognin, William Pettersson-Yeo, Isabel Valli, Chloe Hutton, James Woolley, Paul Allen, Philip McGuire, Andrea Mechelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Review of Potential Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Schizophrenia-Risk.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuroimaging Markers of Resiliency in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: A Qualitative Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Review
  8. Overlapping Neurobiological Substrates for Early-Life Stress and Resilience to Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefania TogninDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London , UK.
William Pettersson-YeoDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London , UK.
Isabel ValliDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London , UK.
Chloe HuttonWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London , London , UK.
James WoolleyDivision of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College London , London , UK.
Paul AllenDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London , UK.
Philip McGuireDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London , UK.
Andrea MechelliDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London , London , UK.
King's College London · GBImperial College London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601437Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging holds the promise that it may one day aid the clinical assessment of individual psychiatric patients. However, the vast majority of studies published so far have been based on average differences between groups, which do not permit accurate inferences at the level of the individual. We examined the potential of structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data for making accurate quantitative predictions about symptom progression in individuals at ultra-high risk for developing psychosis. Forty people at ultra-high risk for psychosis were scanned using structural MRI at first clinical presentation and assessed over a period of 2 years using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Using a multivariate machine learning method known as relevance vector regression (RVR), we examined the relationship between brain structure at first clinical presentation, characterized in terms of gray matter (GM) volume and cortical thickness (CT), and symptom progression at 2-year follow-up. The application of RVR to whole-brain CT MRI data allowed quantitative prediction of clinical scores with statistically significant accuracy (correlation = 0.34, p = 0.026; Mean Squared-Error = 249.63, p = 0.024). This prediction was informed by regions traditionally associated with schizophrenia, namely the right lateral and medial temporal cortex and the left insular cortex. In contrast, the application of RVR to GM volume did not allow prediction of symptom progression with statistically significant accuracy. These results provide proof-of-concept that it could be possible to use structural MRI to inform quantitative prediction of symptom progression in individuals at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis. This would enable clinicians to target those individuals at greatest need of preventative interventions thereby resulting in a more efficient use of health care resources.

Indexed as

cortical thicknessmagnetic resonance imagingpredictionpsychosisrelevance vector regressionsymptom progressionultra-high risk

Identifiers

PMID24523700
PMCPMC3905239
OpenAlexW2086381828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.