Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2014

Galvanic vestibular stimulation in hemi-spatial neglect.

David Wilkinson, Olga Zubko, Mohamed Sakel, Simon Coulton, Tracy Higgins, Patrick Pullicino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Vestibular-guided visual search.Experimental brain research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sensory Neuromodulation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David WilkinsonSchool of Psychology, University of Kent Canterbury, UK.
Olga ZubkoSchool of Psychology, University of Kent Canterbury, UK.
Mohamed SakelEast Kent Neuro-Rehabilitation Service, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust Canterbury, UK.
Simon CoultonCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent Canterbury, UK.
Tracy HigginsCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent Canterbury, UK.
Patrick PullicinoEast Kent Neuro-Rehabilitation Service, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust Canterbury, UK.
University of Kent · GBEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemi-spatial neglect is an attentional disorder in which the sufferer fails to acknowledge or respond to stimuli appearing in contralesional space. In recent years, it has become clear that a measurable reduction in contralesional neglect can occur during galvanic vestibular stimulation, a technique by which transmastoid, small amplitude current induces lateral, attentional shifts via asymmetric modulation of the left and right vestibular nerves. However, it remains unclear whether this reduction persists after stimulation is stopped. To estimate longevity of effect, we therefore conducted a double-blind, randomized, dose-response trial involving a group of stroke patients suffering from left-sided neglect (n = 52, mean age = 66 years). To determine whether repeated sessions of galvanic vestibular stimulation more effectively induce lasting relief than a single session, participants received 1, 5, or 10 sessions, each lasting 25 min, of sub-sensory, left-anodal right-cathodal noisy direct current (mean amplitude = 1 mA). Ninety five percent confidence intervals indicated that all three treatment arms showed a statistically significant improvement between the pre-stimulation baseline and the final day of stimulation on the primary outcome measure, the conventional tests of the Behavioral Inattention Test. More remarkably, this change (mean change = 28%, SD = 18) was still evident 1 month later. Secondary analyses indicated an allied increase of 20% in median Barthel Index (BI) score, a measure of functional capacity, in the absence of any adverse events or instances of participant non-compliance. Together these data suggest that galvanic vestibular stimulation, a simple, cheap technique suitable for home-based administration, may produce lasting reductions in neglect that are clinically important. Further protocol optimization is now needed ahead of a larger effectiveness study.

Indexed as

clinical trialhemi-inattentionneuro-stimulationrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID24523679
PMCPMC3905204
OpenAlexW2120708993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.