Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523664›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2014

Changes in oscillatory dynamics in the cell cycle of early Xenopus laevis embryos.

Tony Y-C Tsai, Julie A Theriot, James E Ferrell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nuclear Dynamics and Its Timing Regulation Revealed by Live-Cell Imaging.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Mathematical Modeling for Oscillations Driven by Noncoding RNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tony Y-C TsaiDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Julie A TheriotDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
James E FerrellDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America ; Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USStanford University · US

Funding

TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COVERT, MARKUS W · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
THE ROLE OF MAP KINASE IN THE CELL CYCLER01GM046383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI FERRELL, JAMES E. · 1991 to 2018
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM046383NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the early development of Xenopus laevis embryos, the first mitotic cell cycle is long (∼85 min) and the subsequent 11 cycles are short (∼30 min) and clock-like. Here we address the question of how the Cdk1 cell cycle oscillator changes between these two modes of operation. We found that the change can be attributed to an alteration in the balance between Wee1/Myt1 and Cdc25. The change in balance converts a circuit that acts like a positive-plus-negative feedback oscillator, with spikes of Cdk1 activation, to one that acts like a negative-feedback-only oscillator, with a shorter period and smoothly varying Cdk1 activity. Shortening the first cycle, by treating embryos with the Wee1A/Myt1 inhibitor PD0166285, resulted in a dramatic reduction in embryo viability, and restoring the length of the first cycle in inhibitor-treated embryos with low doses of cycloheximide partially rescued viability. Computations with an experimentally parameterized mathematical model show that modest changes in the Wee1/Cdc25 ratio can account for the observed qualitative changes in the cell cycle. The high ratio in the first cycle allows the period to be long and tunable, and decreasing the ratio in the subsequent cycles allows the oscillator to run at a maximal speed. Thus, the embryo rewires its feedback regulation to meet two different developmental requirements during early development.

Indexed as

AnimalsCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionDNA-Binding ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianFeedback, PhysiologicalPhosphorylationProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProtein-Tyrosine Kinasesras-GRF1Transcription FactorsXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsCDC2 Protein KinaseCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsMyt1 protein, XenopusProtein-Tyrosine Kinasesras-GRF1Transcription FactorsWEE1 protein, XenopusXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24523664
PMCPMC3921120
OpenAlexW2040273468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.