Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523304›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of adolescent medicine and health2014

Future orientation: a construct with implications for adolescent health and wellbeing.

Sarah R Lindstrom Johnson, Robert W Blum, Tina L Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of adolescent medicine and health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perceptions of the Future and Health Behavior in Adulthood.International journal of aging & human development · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The co-development of ethnic identity and future orientation among ethnically/racially minoritized adolescents: A parallel process model.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah R Lindstrom Johnson
Robert W Blum
Tina L Cheng

Funding

WirelessTechnology Assisted Weight Management in Pre-Diabetic Adolescents...P20MD000198 · NIMHD · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI JENKINS, RENEE R. · 2002 to 2016
$17.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidisciplinary research has supported a relationship between adolescent future orientation (the ability to set future goals and plans) and positive adolescent health and development outcomes. Many preventive strategies - for example, contracepting, exercising - are based on taking actions in the present to avoid unwanted or negative future consequences. However, research has been hampered by unclear and often divergent conceptualizations of the future orientation construct. The present paper aims to integrate previous conceptual and operational definitions into a conceptual framework that can inform programs and services for youth and efforts to evaluate future orientation as a target for intervention. Recommendations focus on furthering the study of the construct through measurement synthesis as well as studies of the normative development of future orientation. Also suggested is the need to pair environmental intervention strategies with individual level efforts to improve future orientation in order to maximize benefits.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentGoalsHealth StatusAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorHopeHumansSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID24523304
PMCPMC4827712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.