Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24523269›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2014

The evolution of traditional knowledge: environment shapes medicinal plant use in Nepal.

C Haris Saslis-Lagoudakis, Julie A Hawkins, Simon J Greenhill, Colin A Pendry, Mark F Watson, Will Tuladhar-Douglas, Sushim R Baral, Vincent Savolainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Phytochemical and Pharmacological Insights intoMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the Pharmacological Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Historical, archaeological and linguistic evidence test the phylogenetic inference of Viking-Age plant use.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C Haris Saslis-LagoudakisSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, , Reading RG6 6BX, UK, Imperial College London, , Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK, Centre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia, School of Culture, History and Language, ANU College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, , Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK, School of Divinity, History and Philosophy, King's College, University of Aberdeen, , Aberdeen AB24 3UB, UK, Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratories, , PO Box 3708, Godawari, Lalitpur, Nepal, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew TW9 3DS, UK.
Julie A Hawkins
Simon J Greenhill
Colin A Pendry
Mark F Watson
Will Tuladhar-Douglas
Sushim R Baral
Vincent Savolainen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional knowledge is influenced by ancestry, inter-cultural diffusion and interaction with the natural environment. It is problematic to assess the contributions of these influences independently because closely related ethnic groups may also be geographically close, exposed to similar environments and able to exchange knowledge readily. Medicinal plant use is one of the most important components of traditional knowledge, since plants provide healthcare for up to 80% of the world's population. Here, we assess the significance of ancestry, geographical proximity of cultures and the environment in determining medicinal plant use for 12 ethnic groups in Nepal. Incorporating phylogenetic information to account for plant evolutionary relatedness, we calculate pairwise distances that describe differences in the ethnic groups' medicinal floras and floristic environments. We also determine linguistic relatedness and geographical separation for all pairs of ethnic groups. We show that medicinal uses are most similar when cultures are found in similar floristic environments. The correlation between medicinal flora and floristic environment was positive and strongly significant, in contrast to the effects of shared ancestry and geographical proximity. These findings demonstrate the importance of adaptation to local environments, even at small spatial scale, in shaping traditional knowledge during human cultural evolution.

Indexed as

EnvironmentKnowledgeMedicine, TraditionalPlants, MedicinalCultural EvolutionHumansNepalSocial Isolationcultural evolutionethnobotanyphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID24523269
PMCPMC4027389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.