Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24522943›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2014

Therapy of acute hypertension in hospitalized children and adolescents.

Tennille N Webb, Ibrahim F Shatat, Yosuke Miyashita

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hypertensive crisis in children and adolescents.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Hypertension in children in emergency department.Journal of renal injury prevention · 2016
    Article
  13. Pediatric hypertensive emergencies.Current hypertension reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tennille N WebbPediatric Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 4401 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206, USA, tennille.webb@chp.edu.
Ibrahim F Shatat
Yosuke Miyashita
University of Pittsburgh · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Research Training in Pediatric NephrologyT32DK091202 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BATES, CARLTON MATTHEW · 2011 to 2020
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK091202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute hypertension (HTN) in hospitalized children and adolescents occurs relatively frequently, and in some cases, if not recognized and treated promptly, it can lead to hypertensive crisis with potentially significant morbidity and mortality. In contrast to adults, where acute HTN is most likely due to uncontrolled primary HTN, children and adolescents with acute HTN are more likely to have secondary HTN. This review will briefly cover evaluation of acute HTN and various age-specific etiologies of secondary HTN and provide more in-depth discussion on treatment targets, potential risks of acute HTN therapy, and available pediatric data on intravenous and oral antihypertensive agents, and it proposes treatment schema including unique therapy of specific secondary HTN scenarios.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAge FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsChildChild, HospitalizedEssential HypertensionHumansHypertensionRiskAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID24522943
PMCPMC4129953
OpenAlexW2028437492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.