Trial reportClinical rheumatology2015
The long-term efficacy and tolerability of hyaluronic acid in adult patients with Kashin-Beck disease of the knee.
Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fine-Grained Differentiation-Based GNN for Auxiliary Diagnosis of Kashin-Beck Disease.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Reliability and validation of the joint dysfunction index as a new assessment instrument for therapeutic efficacy for Kashin-Beck disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of knee pain due to Kashin-Beck disease (KBD). A total of 113 patients with KBD-based knee pain were treated with a 3-week course of HA. Clinical assessments were performed for each patient at 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. The secondary efficacy measures included the WOMAC A (pain), B (stiffness), and C (function) scores; the total WOMAC score; and the global assessments by patients and physicians. Tolerability was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs) and physician reporting. The VAS was significantly reduced within the first 4 weeks of treatment, and the reduction was maintained over 52 weeks (p < 0.001 at each endpoint). These data were supported by the secondary variables WOMAC A (all p < 0.001), WOMAC B (p = 0.002, 0.003, and 0.019, respectively), WOMAC C (all p < 0.001), total WOMAC (all p < 0.001), and the global assessments by patients and physicians at weeks 12, 24, and 52. No serious AEs were reported, and the overall incidence of AEs was 10.6 %. This study suggests that the intra-articular injection of HA is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of knee pain due to KBD as HA therapy resulted in an improvement of symptoms for at least 52 weeks. Additional randomized double-blind studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.