ReviewHistochemistry and cell biology2014
Phototransformable fluorescent proteins: which one for which application?
Review in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blue-shift photoconversion of near-infrared fluorescent proteins for labeling and tracking in living cells and organisms.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Observation of Cation Chromophore Photoisomerization of a Fluorescent Protein Using Millisecond Synchrotron Serial Crystallography and Infrared Vibrational and Visible Spectroscopy.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Preclinical imaging methods for assessing the safety and efficacy of regenerative medicine therapies.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2017Review
- Crystal structure of the fluorescent protein from Dendronephthya sp. in both green and photoconverted red forms.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Article
- Review
- Applications of phototransformable fluorescent proteins for tracking the dynamics of cellular components.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2015Review
- Optical Tools to Investigate Cellular Activity in the Intestinal Wall.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2015Article
- The Histochemistry and Cell Biology pandect: the year 2014 in review.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2015Review
- In this special issue.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In these last two decades , fluorescent proteins (FPs) have become highly valued imaging tools for cell biology, owing to their compatibility with living samples, their low levels of invasiveness and the possibility to specifically fuse them to a variety of proteins of interest. Remarkably, the recent development of phototransformable fluorescent proteins (PTFPs) has made it possible to conceive optical imaging experiments that were unimaginable only a few years ago. For example, it is nowadays possible to monitor intra- or intercellular trafficking, to optically individualize single cells in tissues or to observe single molecules in live cells. The tagging specificity brought by these genetically encoded highlighters leads to constant progress in the engineering of increasingly powerful, versatile and non-cytotoxic FPs. This review is focused on the recent developments of PTFPs and highlights their contribution to studies within cells, tissues and even living organisms. The aspects of single-molecule localization microscopy, intracellular tracking of photoactivated molecules, applications of PTFPs in biotechnology/optobiology and complementarities between PTFPs and other microscopy techniques are particularly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24522394What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.