Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24522145›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2014

Effect of CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, and CYP3A Combined Genotypes on Cyclosporine, Everolimus, and Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplantation.

D J A R Moes, J J Swen, J den Hartigh, T van der Straaten, J J Homan van der Heide, J S Sanders, F J Bemelman, J W de Fijter, H J Guchelaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Low Tacrolimus CClinical pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy: Which drugs can be safely used in the solid organ transplant recipients?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D J A R Moes1] Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands [2] Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J J Swen1] Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands [2] Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J den HartighDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
T van der StraatenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J J Homan van der HeideDepartment of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J S SandersDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
F J BemelmanDepartment of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J W de FijterDepartment of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H J GuchelaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclosporine, everolimus, and tacrolimus are the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. These drugs are characterized by narrow therapeutic windows, highly variable pharmacokinetics (PK), and metabolism by CYP3A enzymes. Recently, the decreased activity allele, CYP3A4*22, was described as a potential predictive marker for CYP3A4 activity. This study investigated the effect of CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, and CYP3A combined genotypes on cyclosporine, everolimus, and tacrolimus PK in renal transplant patients. CYP3A4*22 carriers showed a significant lower clearance for cyclosporine (-15%), and a trend was observed for everolimus (-7%) and tacrolimus (-16%). Patients carrying at least one CYP3A5*1 allele had 1.5-fold higher tacrolimus clearance compared with noncarriers; however, CYP3A5*3 appeared to be nonpredictive for everolimus and cyclosporine. CYP3A combined genotype did not significantly improve prediction of clearance compared with CYP3A5*3 or CYP3A4*22 alone. These data suggest that dose individualization of cyclosporine, everolimus, or tacrolimus therapy based on CYP3A4*22 is not indicated.CPT: Pharmacometrics Systems Pharmacology (2014); 3, e100; doi:10.1038/psp.2013.78; published online 12 February 2014.

Identifiers

PMID24522145
PMCPMC3944116
OpenAlexW1968180599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.