Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24521588›Full record

Trial reportInfection control and hospital epidemiology2014

Daily bathing with chlorhexidine-based soap and the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection.

Melissa A Viray, James C Morley, Craig M Coopersmith, Marin H Kollef, Victoria J Fraser, David K Warren

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology of Surgical Site Infection in a Community Hospital Network.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa A VirayWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
James C Morley
Craig M Coopersmith
Marin H Kollef
Victoria J Fraser
David K Warren

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CER MENTORED CAREER DEVELOPMENT AWARD KM1KM1CA156708 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRASER, VICTORIA J. · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000162NCEZID CDC HHS U54CK000162NCI NIH HHS KM1 CA156708NCI NIH HHS KM1CA156708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine whether daily bathing with chlorhexidine-based soap decreased methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired S. aureus infection among ICU patients.

designProspective pre-post-intervention study with control unit.

settingA 1,250-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Medical and surgical ICU patients.

methodsActive surveillance for MRSA colonization was performed in both ICUs. In June 2005, a chlorhexidine bathing protocol was implemented in the surgical ICU. Changes in S. aureus transmission and infection rate before and after implementation were analyzed using time-series methodology.

resultsThe intervention unit had a 20.68% decrease in MRSA acquisition after institution of the bathing protocol (12.64 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk before the intervention vs 10.03 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk after the intervention; β, -2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), -5.19 to -0.04]; P = .046). There was no significant change in MRSA acquisition in the control ICU during the study period (10.97 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk before June 2005 vs 11.33 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk after June 2005; β, -11.10 [95% CI, -37.40 to 15.19]; P = .40). There was a 20.77% decrease in all S. aureus (including MRSA) acquisition in the intervention ICU from 2002 through 2007 (19.73 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk before the intervention to 15.63 cases per 1,000 patient-days at risk after the intervention [95% CI, -7.25 to -0.95]; P = .012)]. The incidence of ICU-acquired MRSA infections decreased by 41.37% in the intervention ICU (1.96 infections per 1,000 patient-days at risk before the intervention vs 1.15 infections per 1,000 patient-days at risk after the intervention; P = .001).

conclusionsInstitution of daily chlorhexidine bathing in an ICU resulted in a decrease in the transmission of S. aureus, including MRSA. These data support the use of routine daily chlorhexidine baths to decrease rates of S. aureus transmission and infection.

Indexed as

ChlorhexidineDisinfectantsMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusCross InfectionDisinfectionHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsChlorhexidineDisinfectants

Identifiers

PMID24521588
PMCPMC4013781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.