Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24521106›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2014

Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma.

Donald L Morton, John F Thompson, Alistair J Cochran, Nicola Mozzillo, Omgo E Nieweg, Daniel F Roses, Harold J Hoekstra, Constantine P Karakousis, Christopher A Puleo, Brendon J Coventry and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00275496 (A Clinical Study of Wide Excision Alone Versus Wide Excision With Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping and Selective Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Patients With Cutaneous Invasive Melanoma.), which is not on this map. Cited by 450 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
450citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
69.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00275496 phase3completednot on this map

A Clinical Study of Wide Excision Alone Versus Wide Excision With Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping and Selective Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Patients With Cutaneous Invasive Melanoma.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaint John's Cancer InstituteRan1993 to 2012Enrolled2,001ConditionsMelanomaArmsSentinel Lymph Node Dissection, Complete Lymph Node Dissection, Wide Excision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

450 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,453 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

390 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Donald L MortonThe authors' affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
John F Thompson
Alistair J Cochran
Nicola Mozzillo
Omgo E Nieweg
Daniel F Roses
Harold J Hoekstra
Constantine P Karakousis
Christopher A Puleo
Brendon J Coventry
Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
B Mark Smithers
Eberhard Paul
William G Kraybill
J Gregory McKinnon
He-Jing Wang
Robert Elashoff
Mark B Faries
MSLT Group
Saint John's Health Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USMillard Fillmore Suburban Hospital · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNew York University · USNuremberg Hospital · DEPrincess Alexandra Hospital · GBRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY WITH COMBINATION THERMO-CHEMOTHERAPYP01CA029605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COCHRAN, ALISTAIR JOHN · 1985 to 2013
$75.2M
Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT II) in MelanomaR01CA189163 · NCI · SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE · PI FARIES, MARK B · 2014 to 2018
$8.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA29605NCI NIH HHS P01 CA029605NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS R01 CA189163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel-node biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure for regional melanoma staging, was evaluated in a phase 3 trial.

methodsWe evaluated outcomes in 2001 patients with primary cutaneous melanomas randomly assigned to undergo wide excision and nodal observation, with lymphadenectomy for nodal relapse (observation group), or wide excision and sentinel-node biopsy, with immediate lymphadenectomy for nodal metastases detected on biopsy (biopsy group). Results No significant treatment-related difference in the 10-year melanoma-specific survival rate was seen in the overall study population (20.8% with and 79.2% without nodal metastases). Mean (± SE) 10-year disease-free survival rates were significantly improved in the biopsy group, as compared with the observation group, among patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas, defined as 1.20 to 3.50 mm (71.3 ± 1.8% vs. 64.7 ± 2.3%; hazard ratio for recurrence or metastasis, 0.76; P=0.01), and those with thick melanomas, defined as >3.50 mm (50.7 ± 4.0% vs. 40.5 ± 4.7%; hazard ratio, 0.70; P=0.03). Among patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas, the 10-year melanoma-specific survival rate was 62.1 ± 4.8% among those with metastasis versus 85.1 ± 1.5% for those without metastasis (hazard ratio for death from melanoma, 3.09; P<0.001); among patients with thick melanomas, the respective rates were 48.0 ± 7.0% and 64.6 ± 4.9% (hazard ratio, 1.75; P=0.03). Biopsy-based management improved the 10-year rate of distant disease-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis, 0.62; P=0.02) and the 10-year rate of melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio for death from melanoma, 0.56; P=0.006) for patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas and nodal metastases. Accelerated-failure-time latent-subgroup analysis was performed to account for the fact that nodal status was initially known only in the biopsy group, and a significant treatment benefit persisted.

conclusionsBiopsy-based staging of intermediate-thickness or thick primary melanomas provides important prognostic information and identifies patients with nodal metastases who may benefit from immediate complete lymphadenectomy. Biopsy-based management prolongs disease-free survival for all patients and prolongs distant disease-free survival and melanoma-specific survival for patients with nodal metastases from intermediate-thickness melanomas. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00275496.).

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedObservationSkin NeoplasmsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID24521106
PMCPMC4058881
OpenAlexW2145956339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.