Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24520359›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Development and preliminary validation of Chinese preschoolers' eating behavior questionnaire.

Xun Jiang, Xianjun Yang, Yuhai Zhang, Baoxi Wang, Lijun Sun, Lei Shang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health literacy and obesity: A systematic scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Caregivers' feeding behaviour, children's eating behaviour and weight status among children of preschool age in China.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xun JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xianjun YangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yuhai ZhangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Baoxi WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Lijun SunDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Lei ShangDepartment of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to develop a questionnaire for caregivers to assess the eating behavior of Chinese preschoolers.

methodsTo assess children's eating behaviors, 152 items were derived from a broad review of the literature related to epidemiology surveys and the assessment of children's eating behaviors. All of these items were reviewed by 50 caregivers of preschoolers and 10 experienced pediatricians. Seventy-seven items were selected for use in a primary questionnaire. After conducting an exploratory factor analysis and a variability analysis on the data from 313 preschoolers used to evaluate this primary questionnaire, we deleted 39 of these 77 items. A Chinese Preschoolers' Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CPEBQ) was finally established from the remaining 38 items. The structure of this questionnaire was explored by factor analysis, and its reliability, validity and discriminative ability were evaluated with data collected from caregivers of 603 preschoolers.

resultsThe CPEBQ consisted of 7 dimensions and 38 items. The 7 dimensions were food fussiness, food responsiveness, eating habit, satiety responsiveness, exogenous eating, emotional eating and initiative eating. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.92, and the test-retest reliability was 0.72. There were significant differences between the scores of normal-weight, overweight and obese preschoolers when it was referred to food fussiness, food responsiveness, eating habits, satiety responsiveness and emotional eating (p<0.05). Differences in caregiver's education levels also had significant effects on scores for food fussiness, eating habits and exogenous eating (p<0.05).

conclusionsThe CPEBQ satisfies the conditions of reliability and validity, in accordance with psychometric demands. The questionnaire can be employed to evaluate the characteristics of Chinese preschoolers' eating behaviors; therefore, it can be used in child health care practice and research.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesChild, PreschoolChinaDemographyDiscrimination, PsychologicalFactor Analysis, StatisticalFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID24520359
PMCPMC3919741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.