ArticlePloS one2014
Machine learning for outcome prediction of acute ischemic stroke post intra-arterial therapy.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy with Machine Learning : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of machine learning models for predicting outcomes of stroke with structured data.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- A clinical neuroimaging platform for rapid, automated lesion detection and personalized post-stroke outcome prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Stroke Recovery: Predicting Discharge and 3-Month Functional Outcomes.NeuroRehabilitation · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting Ischemic Stroke Patients to Transfer for Endovascular Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning: A Case Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- GPT-based prediction of short-term survival following decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Neurologists-level interpretable CT-based deep neural network for prediction of hemorrhagic transformation after ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- The use of cloud based machine learning to predict outcome in intracerebral haemorrhage without explicit programming expertise.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Signals in the Cells: Multimodal and Contextualized Machine Learning Foundations for Therapeutics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- AI Applications in Adult Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Using AI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting ICU Readmission from Electronic Health Records via BERTopic with Long Short Term Memory Network Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Unveiling the potential of machine learning approaches in predicting the emergence of stroke at its onset: a predicting framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting the complexity and mortality of polytrauma patients with machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Uncertainty-aware deep learning for trustworthy prediction of long-term outcome after endovascular thrombectomy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The Multicentre Acute ischemic stroke imaGIng and Clinical data (MAGIC) repository: rationale and blueprint.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Developing machine learning models to predict multi-class functional outcomes and death three months after stroke in Sweden.PloS one · 2024Article
- Twenty-Five Years of AI in Neurology: The Journey of Predictive Medicine and Biological Breakthroughs.JMIR neurotechnology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of clinical data for COVID-19 outcome estimation with machine learning models.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Article
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStroke is a major cause of death and disability. Accurately predicting stroke outcome from a set of predictive variables may identify high-risk patients and guide treatment approaches, leading to decreased morbidity. Logistic regression models allow for the identification and validation of predictive variables. However, advanced machine learning algorithms offer an alternative, in particular, for large-scale multi-institutional data, with the advantage of easily incorporating newly available data to improve prediction performance. Our aim was to design and compare different machine learning methods, capable of predicting the outcome of endovascular intervention in acute anterior circulation ischaemic stroke.
methodWe conducted a retrospective study of a prospectively collected database of acute ischaemic stroke treated by endovascular intervention. Using SPSS®, MATLAB®, and Rapidminer®, classical statistics as well as artificial neural network and support vector algorithms were applied to design a supervised machine capable of classifying these predictors into potential good and poor outcomes. These algorithms were trained, validated and tested using randomly divided data.
resultsWe included 107 consecutive acute anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients treated by endovascular technique. Sixty-six were male and the mean age of 65.3. All the available demographic, procedural and clinical factors were included into the models. The final confusion matrix of the neural network, demonstrated an overall congruency of ∼ 80% between the target and output classes, with favourable receiving operative characteristics. However, after optimisation, the support vector machine had a relatively better performance, with a root mean squared error of 2.064 (SD: ± 0.408). DISCUSSION: We showed promising accuracy of outcome prediction, using supervised machine learning algorithms, with potential for incorporation of larger multicenter datasets, likely further improving prediction. Finally, we propose that a robust machine learning system can potentially optimise the selection process for endovascular versus medical treatment in the management of acute stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.