Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24520318›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Modeling damage complexity-dependent non-homologous end-joining repair pathway.

Yongfeng Li, Pamela Reynolds, Peter O'Neill, Francis A Cucinotta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Organization and dynamics of the nonhomologous end-joining machinery during DNA double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yongfeng LiDivision of Space Life Sciences, Universities Space Research Association, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Pamela ReynoldsDepartment of Oncology, Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology & Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Peter O'NeillDepartment of Oncology, Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology & Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Francis A CucinottaUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Health Physics and Diagnostics Sciences, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America ; NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Space Radiation Program, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
University of Oxford · GBJohnson Space Center · USUniversities Space Research Association · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is the dominant DNA double strand break (DSB) repair pathway and involves several repair proteins such as Ku, DNA-PKcs, and XRCC4. It has been experimentally shown that the choice of NHEJ proteins is determined by the complexity of DSB. In this paper, we built a mathematical model, based on published data, to study how NHEJ depends on the damage complexity. Under an appropriate set of parameters obtained by minimization technique, we can simulate the kinetics of foci track formation in fluorescently tagged mammalian cells, Ku80-EGFP and DNA-PKcs-YFP for simple and complex DSB repair, respectively, in good agreement with the published experimental data, supporting the notion that simple DSB undergo fast repair in a Ku-dependent, DNA-PKcs-independent manner, while complex DSB repair requires additional DNA-PKcs for end processing, resulting in its slow repair, additionally resulting in slower release rate of Ku and the joining rate of complex DNA ends. Based on the numerous experimental descriptions, we investigated several models to describe the kinetics for complex DSB repair. An important prediction of our model is that the rejoining of complex DSBs is through a process of synapsis formation, similar to a second order reaction between ends, rather than first order break filling/joining. The synapsis formation (SF) model allows for diffusion of ends before the synapsis formation, which is precluded in the first order model by the rapid coupling of ends. Therefore, the SF model also predicts the higher number of chromosomal aberrations observed with high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation due to the higher proportion of complex DSBs compared to low LET radiation, and an increased probability of misrejoin following diffusion before the synapsis is formed, while the first order model does not provide a mechanism for the increased effectiveness in chromosomal aberrations observed.

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairModels, GeneticAnimalsAntigens, NuclearBacterial ProteinsCell LineChromosome PairingDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansKu AutoantigenLuminescent ProteinsAntigens, NuclearBacterial ProteinsDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA-Binding Proteinsenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsKu AutoantigenLuminescent ProteinsXrcc6 protein, humanyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID24520318
PMCPMC3919704
OpenAlexW2024848275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.