Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24520152›Full record

ReviewPhysiological genomics2014

The wound healing, chronic fibrosis, and cancer progression triad.

Brad Rybinski, Janusz Franco-Barraza, Edna Cukierman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeting the Glutaminolysis Pathway in Glaucoma-Associated Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brad RybinskiCancer Biology Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center/Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Janusz Franco-Barraza
Edna Cukierman

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
3D-Adhesion Stromagenesis in Cancer PermissivenessR01CA113451 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CUKIERMAN, EDNA · 2006 to 2016
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA-06927NCI NIH HHS CA-113451NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades tumors have been recognized as "wounds that do not heal." Besides the commonalities that tumors and wounded tissues share, the process of wound healing also portrays similar characteristics with chronic fibrosis. In this review, we suggest a tight interrelationship, which is governed as a concurrence of cellular and microenvironmental reactivity among wound healing, chronic fibrosis, and cancer development/progression (i.e., the WHFC triad). It is clear that the same cell types, as well as soluble and matrix elements that drive wound healing (including regeneration) via distinct signaling pathways, also fuel chronic fibrosis and tumor progression. Hence, here we review the relationship between fibrosis and cancer through the lens of wound healing.

Indexed as

FibrosisWound HealingBlood CoagulationChronic DiseaseDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasmscancerdesmoplasiaepithelial-to-mesenchymal transitionfibrosismyofibroblastsregenerationtumor- or cancer-associated fibroblaststumor stromawound healing

Identifiers

PMID24520152
PMCPMC4035661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.