Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24519881›Full record

ArticleProteins2014

Blind prediction performance of RosettaAntibody 3.0: grafting, relaxation, kinematic loop modeling, and full CDR optimization.

Brian D Weitzner, Daisuke Kuroda, Nicholas Marze, Jianqing Xu, Jeffrey J Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. AI-based IsAb2.0 for antibody design.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Structural Classification of CDR-H3 in Single-Domain VMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How repertoire data are changing antibody science.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian D WeitznerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daisuke Kuroda
Nicholas Marze
Jianqing Xu
Jeffrey J Gray

Funding

Prediction of the Structure of Therapeutic Antibodies with their AntigensR01GM078221 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, JEFFREY J · 2006 to 2020
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody Modeling Assessment II (AMA-II) provided an opportunity to benchmark RosettaAntibody on a set of 11 unpublished antibody structures. RosettaAntibody produced accurate, physically realistic models, with all framework regions and 42 of the 55 non-H3 CDR loops predicted to under an Ångström. The performance is notable when modeling H3 on a homology framework, where RosettaAntibody produced the best model among all participants for four of the 11 targets, two of which were predicted with sub-Ångström accuracy. To improve RosettaAntibody, we pursued the causes of model errors. The most common limitation was template unavailability, underscoring the need for more antibody structures and/or better de novo loop methods. In some cases, better templates could have been found by considering residues outside of the CDRs. De novo CDR H3 modeling remains challenging at long loop lengths, but constraining the C-terminal end of H3 to a kinked conformation allows near-native conformations to be sampled more frequently. We also found that incorrect VL -VH orientations caused models with low H3 RMSDs to score poorly, suggesting that correct VL -VH orientations will improve discrimination between near-native and incorrect conformations. These observations will guide the future development of RosettaAntibody.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComplementarity Determining RegionsHumansImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Light ChainsImmunoglobulinsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationComplementarity Determining RegionsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Light ChainsImmunoglobulinsantigen-binding sitecanonical structureshomology modelingimmunoglobulinloop predictionRosetta

Identifiers

PMID24519881
PMCPMC4107143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.