Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24519768›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Anthony B Miller, Claus Wall, Cornelia J Baines, Ping Sun, Teresa To, Steven A Narod

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02324894 (Initial Evaluation of Ultra FAST Breast Magnetic Resonance in Breast Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 218 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
61.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02324894 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Initial Evaluation of Ultra FAST Breast Magnetic Resonance in Breast Cancer Screening: Comparative Study With Mammography and Ultrasound.

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrugmann University HospitalRan2015 to 2019Enrolled0ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMRI screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 695 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony B MillerDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada.
Claus Wall
Cornelia J Baines
Ping Sun
Teresa To
Steven A Narod
Public Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare breast cancer incidence and mortality up to 25 years in women aged 40-59 who did or did not undergo mammography screening.

designFollow-up of randomised screening trial by centre coordinators, the study's central office, and linkage to cancer registries and vital statistics databases.

setting15 screening centres in six Canadian provinces,1980-85 (Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, and British Columbia).

participants89,835 women, aged 40-59, randomly assigned to mammography (five annual mammography screens) or control (no mammography).

interventionsWomen aged 40-49 in the mammography arm and all women aged 50-59 in both arms received annual physical breast examinations. Women aged 40-49 in the control arm received a single examination followed by usual care in the community.

main outcome measureDeaths from breast cancer.

resultsDuring the five year screening period, 666 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed in the mammography arm (n=44,925 participants) and 524 in the controls (n=44,910), and of these, 180 women in the mammography arm and 171 women in the control arm died of breast cancer during the 25 year follow-up period. The overall hazard ratio for death from breast cancer diagnosed during the screening period associated with mammography was 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.30). The findings for women aged 40-49 and 50-59 were almost identical. During the entire study period, 3250 women in the mammography arm and 3133 in the control arm had a diagnosis of breast cancer, and 500 and 505, respectively, died of breast cancer. Thus the cumulative mortality from breast cancer was similar between women in the mammography arm and in the control arm (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.12). After 15 years of follow-up a residual excess of 106 cancers was observed in the mammography arm, attributable to over-diagnosis.

conclusionAnnual mammography in women aged 40-59 does not reduce mortality from breast cancer beyond that of physical examination or usual care when adjuvant therapy for breast cancer is freely available. Overall, 22% (106/484) of screen detected invasive breast cancers were over-diagnosed, representing one over-diagnosed breast cancer for every 424 women who received mammography screening in the trial.

Indexed as

ForecastingAdultBreast NeoplasmsCanadaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPhysical ExaminationRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24519768
PMCPMC3921437
OpenAlexW2163735782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.