Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24519745›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2014

The impact of educational interventions on modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis after a fragility fracture.

C Beaudoin, L Bessette, S Jean, L-G Ste-Marie, J P Brown

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00359047 (Recognizing Osteoporosis and Its Consequences in Quebec), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00359047 naunknown statusnot on this map

Recognizing Osteoporosis and Its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) Programme

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2003 to 2025Enrolled2,830ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsDocumentation, Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effects of health education on treatment adherence, dietary supplement use, and disease health knowledge among people with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  3. Patient education following vertebral fragility fracture: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Educational booklet reinforces knowledge of osteoporosis and influences intentions to improve bone health in previously diagnosed and treated patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C BeaudoinCHU de Québec Research Centre, 2705, Boulevard Laurier, S-769C, Québec, G1V 4G2, Canada, claudia.beaudoin@crchuq.ulaval.ca.
L Bessette
S Jean
L-G Ste-Marie
J P Brown
Quebec Research and Development CentreHôpital Saint-Luc · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAWilfrid Laurier University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of two educational interventions on the intake of calcium and vitamin D supplements and modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis in women ≥50 years with a fragility fracture (FF). Within 6-8 months of fracture, women were randomized to one of three intervention groups: usual care (UC), written materials (WM), or videocassette and written materials (VC). The written materials for patients and their physician provided information on osteoporosis, FF, and available treatments; written materials for physician were provided through patients. The videocassette presented similar information as the written material, but in greater depth. Twelve months after randomization, the effectiveness of the interventions was assessed. The study cohort consisted of 1,175 women undiagnosed and untreated for osteoporosis. After 12 months, the mean intake of Ca supplements increased by 33, 93, and 91 mg/day for the UC, WM, and VC groups, respectively (p value, WM vs UC = 0.163; VC vs UC = 0.026); the corresponding mean increases for vitamin D were 58, 105, and 118 IU/day (p value, WM vs UC = 0.214; VC vs UC = 0.012). The proportion of women who increased their Ca and vitamin D intake by supplements was similar in all three groups. The intervention had a greater impact in those not taking supplements at randomization and had no impact on modifiable risk factors. In women without diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis, the interventions seem effective at increasing the amounts of Ca and vitamin D supplements, but not effective at inciting more women to increase their consumption. Therefore, the clinical significance of the impact of the intervention is difficult to evaluate.

Indexed as

AgedCalciumCalcium, DietaryDietary SupplementsDrug UtilizationFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMiddle AgedMotor ActivityOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesPatient Education as TopicRecurrenceRisk FactorsVideotape RecordingCalciumCalcium, DietaryVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID24519745
OpenAlexW1987635347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.