SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Pressure-relieving devices for treating heel pressure ulcers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: an overview of Cochrane Reviews and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Topical phenytoin for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Comparative study of the effects of custom-made insole and ordinary insole in adults with flexible flatfoot on different slopes.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Interventions for pressure ulcers: a summary of evidence for prevention and treatment.Spinal cord · 2018Review
- A review of the surgical management of heel pressure ulcers in the 21st century.International wound journal · 2016Review
- Pressure ulcers in the ICU patient: an update on prevention and treatment.Current infectious disease reports · 2015Article
- Multicenter comparison of the efficacy on prevention of pressure ulcer in postoperative patients between two types of pressure-relieving mattresses in China.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPressure ulcers are areas of localised damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure or shear. Pressure redistribution devices are used as part of the treatment to reduce the pressure on the ulcer. The anatomy of the heel and the susceptibility of the foot to vascular disease mean that pressure ulcers located there require a particular approach to pressure relief.
objectivesTo determine the effects of pressure-relieving interventions for treating pressure ulcers on the heel. SEARCH
methodsIn May 2013, for this first update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register; The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid EMBASE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); and EBSCO CINAHL. No language or publication date restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of pressure-relieving devices on the healing of pressure ulcers of the heel. Participants were treated in any care setting. Interventions were any pressure-relieving devices including mattresses and specific heel devices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts and selected studies for inclusion. Both review authors independently extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias. MAIN
resultsIn our original review, only one study met the inclusion criteria. This study (141 participants) compared two mattress systems; however, losses to follow up were too great to permit reliable conclusions. We did not find any further relevant studies during this first update. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review identified one small study at moderate to high risk of bias which provided no evidence to inform practice. More research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.