ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2014
Reproducibility of 3D chromatin configuration reconstructions.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can 3D diploid genome reconstruction from unphased Hi-C data be salvaged?NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Assessing stationary distributions derived from chromatin contact maps.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- The Rabl configuration limits topological entanglement of chromosomes in budding yeast.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Topological Constraints in Eukaryotic Genomes and How They Can Be Exploited to Improve Spatial Models of Chromosomes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
- Improved accuracy assessment for 3D genome reconstructions.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- High-resolution 3D models of Caulobacter crescentus chromosome reveal genome structural variability and organization.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Sequence-based multiscale modeling for high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data analysis.PloS one · 2018Article
- Discovering hotspots in functional genomic data superposed on 3D chromatin configuration reconstructions.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
- 3CDB: a manually curated database of chromosome conformation capture data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Reconstruction of 3D genome architecture via a two-stage algorithm.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Modeling chromosomes: Beyond pretty pictures.FEBS letters · 2015Review
- Improving 3D Genome Reconstructions Using Orthologous and Functional Constraints.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Inferential modeling of 3D chromatin structure.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Assessing the limits of restraint-based 3D modeling of genomes and genomic domains.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Current theoretical models fail to predict the topological complexity of the human genome.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2015Article
- Distance-based assessment of the localization of functional annotations in 3D genome reconstructions.BMC genomics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is widely recognized that the three-dimensional (3D) architecture of eukaryotic chromatin plays an important role in processes such as gene regulation and cancer-driving gene fusions. Observing or inferring this 3D structure at even modest resolutions had been problematic, since genomes are highly condensed and traditional assays are coarse. However, recently devised high-throughput molecular techniques have changed this situation. Notably, the development of a suite of chromatin conformation capture (CCC) assays has enabled elicitation of contacts-spatially close chromosomal loci-which have provided insights into chromatin architecture. Most analysis of CCC data has focused on the contact level, with less effort directed toward obtaining 3D reconstructions and evaluating the accuracy and reproducibility thereof. While questions of accuracy must be addressed experimentally, questions of reproducibility can be addressed statistically-the purpose of this paper. We use a constrained optimization technique to reconstruct chromatin configurations for a number of closely related yeast datasets and assess reproducibility using four metrics that measure the distance between 3D configurations. The first of these, Procrustes fitting, measures configuration closeness after applying reflection, rotation, translation, and scaling-based alignment of the structures. The others base comparisons on the within-configuration inter-point distance matrix. Inferential results for these metrics rely on suitable permutation approaches. Results indicate that distance matrix-based approaches are preferable to Procrustes analysis, not because of the metrics per se but rather on account of the ability to customize permutation schemes to handle within-chromosome contiguity. It has recently been emphasized that the use of constrained optimization approaches to 3D architecture reconstruction are prone to being trapped in local minima. Our methods of reproducibility assessment provide a means for comparing 3D reconstruction solutions so that we can discern between local and global optima by contrasting solutions under perturbed inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.