Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24519450›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2014

Reproducibility of 3D chromatin configuration reconstructions.

Mark R Segal, Hao Xiong, Daniel Capurso, Mariel Vazquez, Javier Arsuaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chromosome position determines the success of double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  10. 3CDB: a manually curated database of chromosome conformation capture data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark R SegalDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA mark@biostat.ucsf.edu.
Hao XiongDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Daniel CapursoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Mariel VazquezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Javier ArsuagaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USADepartment of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.

Funding

PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND PHARMACOGENOMICST32GM007175 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AHITUV, NADAV, KROETZ, DEANNA L · 1985 to 2021
$7.1M
Reconstruction of 3D Genome Architecture from Chromatin Conformation Capture DataR01GM109457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEGAL, MARK R · 2013 to 2020
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM109457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109457NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely recognized that the three-dimensional (3D) architecture of eukaryotic chromatin plays an important role in processes such as gene regulation and cancer-driving gene fusions. Observing or inferring this 3D structure at even modest resolutions had been problematic, since genomes are highly condensed and traditional assays are coarse. However, recently devised high-throughput molecular techniques have changed this situation. Notably, the development of a suite of chromatin conformation capture (CCC) assays has enabled elicitation of contacts-spatially close chromosomal loci-which have provided insights into chromatin architecture. Most analysis of CCC data has focused on the contact level, with less effort directed toward obtaining 3D reconstructions and evaluating the accuracy and reproducibility thereof. While questions of accuracy must be addressed experimentally, questions of reproducibility can be addressed statistically-the purpose of this paper. We use a constrained optimization technique to reconstruct chromatin configurations for a number of closely related yeast datasets and assess reproducibility using four metrics that measure the distance between 3D configurations. The first of these, Procrustes fitting, measures configuration closeness after applying reflection, rotation, translation, and scaling-based alignment of the structures. The others base comparisons on the within-configuration inter-point distance matrix. Inferential results for these metrics rely on suitable permutation approaches. Results indicate that distance matrix-based approaches are preferable to Procrustes analysis, not because of the metrics per se but rather on account of the ability to customize permutation schemes to handle within-chromosome contiguity. It has recently been emphasized that the use of constrained optimization approaches to 3D architecture reconstruction are prone to being trapped in local minima. Our methods of reproducibility assessment provide a means for comparing 3D reconstruction solutions so that we can discern between local and global optima by contrasting solutions under perturbed inputs.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularMolecular ConformationChromatinGenomeReproducibility of ResultsChromatinChromatin conformationDistance matrixGenome architectureProcrustes analysis

Identifiers

PMID24519450
PMCPMC4059464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.