ReviewRadiation and environmental biophysics2014
Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry.
Review in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of an imaging flow cytometry γ-H2AX assay for biodosimetry using supervised machine learning.International journal of radiation biology · 2026Article
- Improved quantitative accuracy in data-independent acquisition proteomics via retention time boundary imputation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- FISH unveils a unified method for multi-marker biodose assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effects of age and other individual factors on radiation induced ESR signals from fingernails.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Establishment of a Radiation Dose-Response Calibration Curve Using a Rapid Cytokinesis-block Micronucleus Assay for Dose Assessment of Medical Radiation Equipment.Genome integrity · 2025Article
- Validation of a blood biomarker panel for machine learning-based radiation biodosimetry in juvenile and adult C57BL/6 mice.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Biomarkers of mitochondrial stress and DNA damage during pediatric catheter-directed neuroangiography - a prospective single-center study.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Benefits and challenges of in vivo EPR nail biodosimetry in a second tier of medical triage in response to a large radiation event.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2023Review
- Establishment ofHeliyon · 2023Article
- Automated identification of single and clustered chromosomes for metaphase image analysis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Peripheral Blood Transcript Signatures after Internal 131I-mIBG Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Neuroblastoma Patients Identifies Early and Late Biomarkers of Internal 131I Exposures.Radiation research · 2022Article
- Article
- Establishment ofFrontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Dose Variations Using an X-Ray Cabinet to EstablishFrontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Effects of Low-dose Gamma Radiation on Expression of Apoptotic Genes in Rat Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021Article
- The design of X-band EPR cavity with narrow detection aperture for in vivo fingernail dosimetry after accidental exposure to ionizing radiation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Two-miRNA-based finger-stick assay for estimation of absorbed ionizing radiation dose.Science translational medicine · 2020Article
- Review
- Establishing a Reference Dose-Response Calibration Curve for Dicentric Chromosome Aberrations to Assess Accidental Radiation Exposure in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Intrabeam Radiation Inhibits Proliferation, Migration, and Invasiveness and Promotes Apoptosis of MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The principle of biodosimetry is to utilize changes induced in the individual by ionizing radiation to estimate the dose and, if possible, to predict or reflect the clinically relevant response, i.e., the biological consequences of the dose. Ideally, the changes should be specific for ionizing radiation, and the response should be unaffected by prior medical or physiological variations among subjects, including changes that might be caused by the stress and trauma from a radiation event. There are two basic types of biodosimetry with different and often complementary characteristics: those based on changes in biological parameters such as gene activation or chromosomal abnormalities and those based on physical changes in tissues (detected by techniques such as EPR). In this paper, we consider the applicability of the various techniques for different scenarios: small- and large-scale exposures to levels of radiation that could lead to the acute radiation syndrome and exposures with lower doses that do not need immediate care, but should be followed for evidence of long-term consequences. The development of biodosimetry has been especially stimulated by the needs after a large-scale event where it is essential to have a means to identify those individuals who would benefit from being brought into the medical care system. Analyses of the conventional methods officially recommended for responding to such events indicate that these methods are unlikely to achieve the results needed for timely triage of thousands of victims. Emerging biodosimetric methods can fill this critically important gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.