ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2014
Is intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalation safe and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming amplification-mediated resistance to sotorasib by dose re-escalation in KRAS G12C mutant NSCLC: a case report.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Efficacy of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma achieved by sorafenib dose re-escalation after failure of long-term low-dose-sorafenib treatment combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: a case report.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Efficacy of bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018Article
- Evaluation of dose-efficacy of sorafenib and effect of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough sorafenib improves survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), doses have to be reduced in quite a few patients because of adverse events. We investigated whether intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalations were safe and tolerable in patients with advanced HCC.
methodsOf the 73 advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib, 42 achieved a tolerable dose with a dose reduction. We evaluated safety and tolerability in patients who attempted intra-patient dose re-escalations from the reduced dose.
resultsThirteen of 42 patients increased the sorafenib dose from the reduced dose. Ten patients had a tolerable dose of 400 mg on alternate days, and 3 patients had a tolerable dose of 400 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as toxicity resulting in a dose reduction, was observed in 8 of 13 patients as a hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), and DLT was noted in 2 of 13 patients as an increase in alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels. Seven of 13 patients did not exhibit DLT after dose re-escalations. Although 6 patients exhibited DLT, the cause of the adverse event was HFSR in all cases. The median escalation dose ratio, which was calculated as the ratio of the real cumulative dose to the cumulative dose when continued at the tolerable dose after dose re-escalation, was 1.84.
conclusionsThe results of the present study indicated that intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalations were safe and tolerable. Further prospective analyses are needed to determine in more detail the safety and efficacy of intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24519322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.