Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24519300›Full record

ArticleJAMA2014

Thirty-day hospital readmission following discharge from postacute rehabilitation in fee-for-service Medicare patients.

Kenneth J Ottenbacher, Amol Karmarkar, James E Graham, Yong-Fang Kuo, Anne Deutsch, Timothy A Reistetter, Soham Al Snih, Carl V Granger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utility of Functional Metrics Assessed During Acute Care on Hospital Outcomes: A Systematic Review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth J OttenbacherDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston.
Amol KarmarkarDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston.
James E GrahamDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston.
Yong-Fang KuoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, UTMB.
Anne DeutschRTI International, Washington, DC, and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Timothy A ReistetterDepartment of Occupational Therapy, UTMB.
Soham Al SnihDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston.
Carl V GrangerUniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, Buffalo, New York6Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USRTI International · USAmerican Physical Therapy Association · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
UTMB CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: NASA BED REST STUDIESUL1RR029876 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2009 to 2011
$17.7M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in the ElderlyR24HS022134 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GOODWIN, MD, JAMES S. · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
Center for Rehabilitation Research Using Large DatasetsR24HD065702 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OTTENBACHER, KENNETH J. · 2010 to 2014
$4.0M
Hospital Readmission and Inpatient Medical RehabilitationR01HD069443 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI OTTENBACHER, KENNETH J. · 2012 to 2015
$927k
Regional Variability in Inpatient Rehabilitation among Medicare BeneficiariesK01HD068513 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI REISTETTER, TIMOTHY · 2011 to 2014
$438k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022134AHRQ HHS R24-HS022134NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029876NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029876NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD068513NICHD NIH HHS K01-HD068513NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069443NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD069443NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD065702NICHD NIH HHS R24-HD065702PHS HHS H133G080163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services recently identified 30-day readmission after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation facilities as a national quality indicator. Research is needed to determine the rates and factors related to readmission in this patient population.

objectiveTo determine 30-day readmission rates and factors related to readmission for patients receiving postacute inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of records for 736,536 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (mean age, 78.0 [SD, 7.3] years) discharged from 1365 inpatient rehabilitation facilities to the community in 2006 through 2011. Sixty-three percent of patients were women, and 85.1% were non-Hispanic white. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day readmission rates for the 6 largest diagnostic impairment categories receiving inpatient rehabilitation. These included stroke, lower extremity fracture, lower extremity joint replacement, debility, neurologic disorders, and brain dysfunction.

resultsMean rehabilitation length of stay was 12.4 (SD, 5.3) days. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 11.8% (95% CI, 11.7%-11.8%). Rates ranged from 5.8% (95% CI, 5.8%-5.9%) for patients with lower extremity joint replacement to 18.8% (95% CI, 18.8%-18.9%). for patients with debility. Rates were highest in men (13.0% [ 95% CI, 12.8%-13.1%], vs 11.0% [95% CI, 11.0%-11.1%] in women), non-Hispanic blacks (13.8% [95% CI, 13.5%-14.1%], vs 11.5% [95% CI, 11.5%-11.6%] in whites, 12.5% [95% CI, 12.1%-12.8%] in Hispanics, and 11.9% [95% CI, 11.4%-12.4%] in other races/ethnicities), beneficiaries with dual eligibility (15.1% [95% CI, 14.9%-15.4%], vs 11.1% [95% CI, 11.0%-11.2%] for no dual eligibility), and in patients with tier 1 comorbidities (25.6% [95% CI, 24.9%-26.3%], vs 18.9% [95% CI, 18.5%-19.3%] for tier 2, 15.1% [95% CI, 14.9%-15.3%] for tier 3, and 9.9% [95% CI, 9.9%-10.0%] for no tier comorbidities). Higher motor and cognitive functional status were associated with lower hospital readmission rates across the 6 impairment categories. Adjusted readmission rates by state ranged from 9.2% to 13.6%. Approximately 50% of patients rehospitalized within the 30-day period were readmitted within 11 days of discharge. Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group codes for heart failure, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, septicemia, nutritional and metabolic disorders, esophagitis, gastroenteritis, and digestive disorders were common reasons for readmission. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among postacute rehabilitation facilities providing services to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 30-day readmission rates ranged from 5.8% to 18.8% for selected impairment groups. Further research is needed to understand the causes of readmission.

Indexed as

AftercareAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, ReplacementCohort StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleFractures, BoneHumansInpatientsMaleMedicareNervous System DiseasesPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionQuality Indicators, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID24519300
PMCPMC4085109
OpenAlexW2149644139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.