Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24519198›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2014

Can Doppler or contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis add diagnostically important information about the nature of breast lesions?

Daniela Stanzani, Luciano F Chala, Nestor de Barros, Giovanni G Cerri, Maria Cristina Chammas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniela StanzaniInstituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da, Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Luciano F ChalaInstituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da, Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Nestor de BarrosInstituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da, Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Giovanni G CerriInstituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da, Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
Maria Cristina ChammasInstituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da, Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil, Instituto de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite evidence suggesting that Doppler ultrasonography can help to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions, it is rarely applied in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether certain vascular features of breast masses observed by duplex Doppler and color Doppler ultrasonography (before and/or after microbubble contrast injection) add information to the gray-scale analysis and support the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification.

methodsSeventy solid lesions were prospectively evaluated with gray-scale ultrasonography, color Doppler ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. The morphological analysis and lesion vascularity were correlated with the histological results.

resultsPercutaneous core biopsies revealed that 25/70 (17.5%) lesions were malignant, while 45 were benign. Hypervascular lesions with tortuous and central vessels, a resistive index (RI)≥ 0.73 before contrast injection, and an RI≥ 0.75 after contrast injection were significantly predictive of malignancy (p<0.001).

conclusionThe combination of gray-scale ultrasonography data with unenhanced or enhanced duplex Doppler and color Doppler US data can provide diagnostically useful information. These techniques can be easily implemented because Doppler devices are already present in most health centers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChi-Square DistributionContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexUltrasonography, MammaryContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID24519198
PMCPMC3912319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.