ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2014
Rapid growth in use of personal health records in New York, 2012-2013.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Identifying How Patient Portals Impact Communication in Oncology.Health communication · 2019Article
- Technology Access, Technical Assistance, and Disparities in Inpatient Portal Use.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Should parents see their teen's medical record? Asking about the effect on adolescent-doctor communication changes attitudes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Focus Section Health IT Usability: Applying a Task-Technology Fit Model to Adapt an Electronic Patient Portal for Patient Work.Applied clinical informatics · 2018Article
- Characteristics of Innovators Adopting a National Personal Health Record in Portugal: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2017Article
- Meaningful Use of an Electronic Personal Health Record (ePHR) among Pediatric Cancer Survivors.Applied clinical informatics · 2017Article
- What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review.Research integrity and peer review · 2017Review
- Patients' and healthcare providers' perceptions of a mobile portal application for hospitalized patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in adoption of personal health records over time.The American journal of managed care · 2016Article
- Personal Health Records: Beneficial or Burdensome for Patients and Healthcare Providers?Perspectives in health information managemen · 2016Article
- Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Review
- The invisible work of personal health information management among people with multiple chronic conditions: qualitative interview study among patients and providers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Strategies for Managing Mobile Devices for Use by Hospitalized Inpatients.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015Article
- Initial Usability and Feasibility Evaluation of a Personal Health Record-Based Self-Management System for Older Adults.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2015Article
- Capsule commentary on Ancker et al., Rapid growth in use of personal health records in New York, 2012-2013.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Article
- Personal health records: is rapid adoption hindering interoperability?Perspectives in health information managemen · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiving patients access to their own medical data may help improve communication and engage patients in healthcare. As a result, the federal electronic health record (EHR) incentive program requires providers to offer electronic data sharing with patients via personal health records (PHRs) or other technologies.
objectiveWe sought to estimate the rate of adoption of PHRs over a 2-year period.
designSurvey of 800 respondents (margin of error: 3.5 percentage points) in consecutive years of the Empire State Poll, an annual random-digit-dial telephone survey.
participantsAdult New York State residents. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported use of a PHR. KEY
resultsThe rate of reported PHR use rose from 11 % in 2012 to 17 % in 2013. The proportion of these PHRs provided by doctors or healthcare organizations also increased sharply (from 50 % in 2012 to 73 % in 2013, p < 0.01) with a corresponding decrease in the proportion provided by insurers.
conclusionsThe proportion of New York State residents using PHRs increased by more than 50 % (from 11 to 17 %) in advance of a federal incentive program requirement that healthcare organizations with EHRs must share electronic data with patients in order to receive their incentives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.