Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24518774›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2014

Statin drug use is not associated with prostate cancer risk in men who are regularly screened.

Elizabeth A Platz, Catherine M Tangen, Phyllis J Goodman, Cathee Till, Howard L Parnes, William D Figg, Demetrius Albanes, Marian L Neuhouser, Eric A Klein, M Scott Lucia and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A PlatzDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: eplatz@jhu.edu.
Catherine M TangenSWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Phyllis J GoodmanSWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Cathee TillSWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Howard L ParnesDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
William D FiggMedical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Demetrius AlbanesDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland.
Marian L NeuhouserCancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Eric A KleinCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
M Scott LuciaUniversity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Ian M ThompsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Alan R KristalCancer Prevention Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USCenter for Cancer Research · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
TRANSGENIC MODELS FOR PROSTATE CANCER AND AUTOIMMUNITYP50CA058236 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DENMEADE, SAMUEL R · 1992 to 2020
$43.9M
Oxidative Damage and DNA Repair in the PCPTP01CA108964 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI THOMPSON, IAN M · 2005 to 2009
$13.6M
Identify SNPs and Polymorphisms Involved in the Development of Prostate CancerZIABC010453 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$10.4M
PCPT and SELECT cohorts: Core Infrastructure Support for Cancer Research UM1CA182883 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TANGEN, CATHERINE M., THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2013 to 2017
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA108964NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058236NCI NIH HHS P50 CA58236NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429NCI NIH HHS U10 CA37429NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProspective cohort studies support the hypothesis that statin drug users have a lower risk of aggressive prostate cancer. Whether statin drug use influences the risk of screen detected disease is less clear, possibly because of complex detection biases. Thus, we investigated this association in a setting in which men had low baseline serum prostate specific antigen concentration and were screened annually. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a cohort study of 9,457 men 55 years old or older at randomization to the placebo arm of PCPT (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial). The men reported new use of medications quarterly. We estimated the multivariable adjusted HR of prostate cancer (574 cases in 62,192 person-years) for statin drug use and duration of use during the trial using Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsDuring 7 years of followup statin drug use during the trial was not associated with the risk of total prostate cancer (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.30), or lower grade (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71-1.29) or higher grade (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.85-1.90) prostate cancer. Duration of use during followup was also not associated with the risk of total, or lower or higher grade disease (p trend=0.7, 0.5 and 0.2, respectively).

conclusionsThese prospective results do not support the hypothesis that statin drugs protect against prostate cancer in the setting of regular prostate cancer screening.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsProstate-Specific Antigenhydroxymethylglutaryl-coA reductase inhibitorsmass screeningprostateprostatic neoplasmsrisk

Identifiers

PMID24518774
PMCPMC4104140
OpenAlexW2103902335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.