Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24518595›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Breast cancer: trends in international incidence in men and women.

E Kreiter, A Richardson, J Potter, Y Yasui

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Breast cancer and cytomegalovirus.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Characterization and Mortality From Breast Cancer in Men.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Estimation of health state utilities in breast cancer.Patient preference and adherence · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E KreiterDepartment of Public Health Science, School of Public Health, University of Alberta 3-381 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87th Avenue, Edmonton Alberta T6G 1C9, Canada.
A RichardsonWayne Francis Cancer Epidemiology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
J PotterPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, M4B402, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Y YasuiDepartment of Public Health Science, School of Public Health, University of Alberta 3-381 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87th Avenue, Edmonton Alberta T6G 1C9, Canada.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe age-standardised incidence of breast cancer varies geographically, with rates in the highest-risk countries more than five times those in the lowest-risk countries.

methodsWe investigated the correlation between male (MBC) and female breast cancer (FBC) incidence stratified by female age-group (<50 years, and ≥50 years) and used Poisson regression to examine male incidence rate ratios according to female incidence rates.

resultsAge-adjusted breast cancer incidence rates for males and females share a similar geographic distribution (Spearman's correlation=0.51; P<0.0001). A correlation with male incidence rates was found for the entire female population and for women aged 50 years and over. Breast cancer incidence rates in males aged <50 years were not associated with FBC incidence, whereas those in males aged 50 years were. MBC incidence displays a small 'hook' similar to the Clemmesen's hook for FBC, but at a later age than the female hook.

interpretationFurther investigation of possible explanations for these patterns is warranted. Although the incidence of breast cancer is much lower in men than in women, it may be possible to identify a cause common to both men and women.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleFemaleGeographyGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24518595
PMCPMC3974084
OpenAlexW1980208656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.