Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24517318›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2014

Importance of Aspergillus spp. isolation in Acute exacerbations of severe COPD: prevalence, factors and follow-up: the FUNGI-COPD study.

Arturo Huerta, Nestor Soler, Mariano Esperatti, Mónica Guerrero, Rosario Menendez, Alexandra Gimeno, Rafael Zalacaín, Nuria Mir, Jose Maria Aguado, Antoni Torres

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Human Respiratory Microbiome: Current Understandings and Future Directions.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Fungal lung disease.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Bacterial Interactions withMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  18. RespiratoryFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  19. Fungal Infection during COVID-19: DoesAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arturo Huerta
Nestor Soler
Mariano Esperatti
Mónica Guerrero
Rosario Menendez
Alexandra Gimeno
Rafael Zalacaín
Nuria Mir
Jose Maria Aguado
Antoni TorresDepartment of Pneumology, Institute of Thorax (ICT), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona (UB), CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES 06/06/0028), Villarroel 170, 08037 Barcelona, Spain. atorres@clinic.ub.es.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESHospital de Cruces · ESPfizer (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are often associated with infectious agents, some of which may be non-usual, including Aspergillus spp. However, the importance of Aspergillus spp. in the clinical management of AECOPD still remains unclear.

objectivesThe aims of the study were to analyze the prevalence and risk factors associated with Aspergillus spp. isolation in AECOPD, and to investigate the associated clinical outcomes during a 1-year follow-up period.

methodsPatients presenting with an AECOPD requiring hospitalization were prospectively included from four hospitals across Spain. Clinical, radiological and microbiological data were collected at admission and during the follow-up period (1, 6 and 12 months after discharge), and re-admissions and mortality data collected during the follow-up.

resultsA total of 240 patients with severe AECOPD were included. Valid sputum samples were obtained in 144 (58%) patients, and in this group, the prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation was 16.6% on admission and 14.1% at one-year follow-up. Multivariate logistic-regression showed that AECOPD in the previous year (OR 12.35; 95% CI, 1.9-29.1; p < 0.001), concurrent isolation of pathogenic bacteria (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.65-9.45, p = 0.001) and concomitant isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2.80; 95% IC, 1.81-11.42; p = 0.001) were the main risk factors for Aspergillus spp. isolation.

conclusionsThe main risk factors for Aspergillus spp. isolation were AECOPD in the previous year and concomitant isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, although Aspergillus spp. is often isolated in sputum samples from patients with AECOPD, the pathogenic and clinical significance remains unclear.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overAspergillusCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24517318
PMCPMC3996133
OpenAlexW2127228892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.