Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24517289›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2014

Synthetic versus natural curcumin: bioequivalence in an in vitro oral mucositis model.

Sonja C Lüer, Jeannette Goette, Rolf Troller, Christoph Aebi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Preparation of Poloxamer188-Frontiers in chemistry · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonja C LüerDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern CH-3010, Switzerland. sonja.lueer@insel.ch.
Jeannette Goette
Rolf Troller
Christoph Aebi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurcumin (CUR) is a dietary spice and food colorant (E100). Its potent anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting the activation of Nuclear Factor-κB is well established.

methodsThe aim of this study was to compare natural purified CUR (nCUR) with synthetically manufactured CUR (sCUR) with respect to their capacity to inhibit detrimental effects in an in vitro model of oral mucositis. The hypothesis was to demonstrate bioequivalence of nCUR and sCUR.

resultsThe purity of sCUR was HPLC-confirmed. Adherence and invasion assays for bacteria to human pharyngeal epithelial cells demonstrated equivalence of nCUR and sCUR. Standard assays also demonstrated an identical inhibitory effect on pro-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine secretion (e.g., interleukin-8, interleukin-6) by Detroit pharyngeal cells exposed to bacterial stimuli. There was bioequivalence of sCUR and nCUR with respect to their antibacterial effects against various pharyngeal species.

conclusionnCUR and sCUR are equipotent in in vitro assays mimicking aspects of oral mucositis. The advantages of sCUR include that it is odorless and tasteless, more easily soluble in DMSO, and that it is a single, highly purified molecule, lacking the batch-to-batch variation of CUR content in nCUR. sCUR is a promising agent for the development of an oral anti-mucositis agent.

Indexed as

StomatitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsChemistry, PharmaceuticalCurcumaCurcuminCytokinesEpithelial CellsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMouth MucosaPlant ExtractsTherapeutic EquivalencyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCurcuminCytokinesPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID24517289
PMCPMC3927628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.