Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24517242›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2014

A consensus based template for reporting of pre-hospital major incident medical management.

Sabina Fattah, Marius Rehn, David Lockey, Julian Thompson, Hans Morten Lossius, Torben Wisborg, Major Incidence Reporting Collaborators

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lessons learned from terror attacks: thematic priorities and development since 2001-results from a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Great Belt train accident: the emergency medical services response.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Trials and tribulations: how we established a major incident database.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    multiple collaborator names added
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sabina FattahDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drøbak, Norway. sabina.fattah@norskluftambulanse.no.
Marius Rehn
David Lockey
Julian Thompson
Hans Morten Lossius
Torben Wisborg
Major Incidence Reporting Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructured reporting of major incidents has been advocated to improve the care provided at future incidents. A systematic review identified ten existing templates for reporting major incident medical management, but these templates are not in widespread use. We aimed to address this challenge by designing an open access template for uniform reporting of data from pre-hospital major incident medical management that will be tested for feasibility.

methodsAn expert group of thirteen European major incident practitioners, planners or academics participated in a four stage modified nominal group technique consensus process to design a novel reporting template. Initially, each expert proposed 30 variables. Secondly, these proposals were combined and each expert prioritized 45 variables from the total of 270. Thirdly, the expert group met in Norway to develop the template. Lastly, revisions to the final template were agreed via e-mail.

resultsThe consensus process resulted in a template consisting of 48 variables divided into six categories; pre-incident data, Emergency Medical Service (EMS) background, incident characteristics, EMS response, patient characteristics and key lessons.

conclusionsThe expert group reached consensus on a set of key variables to report the medical management of pre-hospital major incidents and developed a novel reporting template. The template will be freely available for downloading and reporting on http://www.majorincidentreporting.org. This is the first global open access database for pre-hospital major incident reporting. The use of a uniform dataset will allow comparative analysis and has potential to identify areas of improvement for future responses.

Indexed as

EmergenciesGroup ProcessesQuality of Health CareConsensus Statements as TopicDocumentationEmergency Medical ServicesHumansNorway

Identifiers

PMID24517242
PMCPMC3922248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.