Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516803›Full record

ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2014

A brief overview of surgery for atrial fibrillation.

James L Cox

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02968056 (One Staged Hybrid Approach of Minimally Invasively Surgical/Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02968056 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

One Staged Hybrid Approach of Minimally Invasively Surgical/Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2016 to 2019Enrolled160ConditionsPersistent Atrial FibrillationArmsRadiofrequency ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery. State-of-the-art scoping review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. The Ligament of Marshall: Far From Vestigial!Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James L CoxDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery Emeritus, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Barnes-Jewish Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Maze procedure was the first surgical technique developed to ablate, rather than isolate, atrial fibrillation and was first performed clinically in 1987. The experimental and clinical electrophysiological maps on which the Maze procedure was based demonstrated the presence of two or more large (5-6 cm diameter) macro-reentrant circuits during established atrial fibrillation (AF). Eleven years later, focal triggers were identified, primarily in and around the pulmonary veins, and were shown to be responsible for the induction of individual episodes of AF. Thus, it became clear that episodes of paroxysmal AF could be treated in most patients by isolating or ablating the region of the pulmonary veins, but that once AF became non-paroxysmal and thus dependent upon the macro-reentrant circuits for its maintenance, it would still be necessary to perform some type of additional procedure to interrupt those circuits. Approximately 100,000 patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve surgery in the US also have associated AF, but only 20% of them undergo a concomitant procedure to ablate the AF. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that treating the AF at the time of these other primary operations results in an improved quality of life, fewer long-term strokes and improved long-term survival while adding no risk to the overall surgical procedure. Moreover, the major cardiology and surgery societies recommend that concomitant AF surgery be performed in all cases when feasible. Patients undergoing CABG and AVR who have paroxysmal AF should undergo pulmonary vein isolation, while those with non-paroxysmal AF (persistent or long-standing persistent AF) should have a Maze procedure. Patients undergoing mitral valve surgery who have either paroxysmal AF or non-paroxysmal AF should undergo a Maze procedure.

Indexed as

concomitant atrial fibrillationMaze procedurenon-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (N-PAF)paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF)pulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID24516803
PMCPMC3904338
OpenAlexW2168818590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.