ArticleEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2011
BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly in nasal and non-nasal swab specimens from haematologic patients.
Article in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- PCR-based Approaches for the Detection of Clinical Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.The open microbiology journal · 2016Article
- Comparative study of nasal bacterial carriage in pediatric patients from two different geographical regions.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are responsible for rising health care costs and have a high attribution to mortality. Reliable and rapid detection of MRSA carriage is essential. Real-time PCR allows an early detection of MRSA colonization within 2 h. By using the BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay we analysed directly swabs of different sampling sites and compared the assay with culture method. One thousand one hundred and sixty samples from 129 patients in Magdeburg were examined. Of the samples, 8 (0.69%) or 1117 (96.3%) were tested equally positive or negative by both methods whereas 16 (1.38%) specimens were MRSA positive only by the GeneOhm-MRSA assay and 6 (0.52%) were MRSA positive only by culture method. Thirteen samples (1.12%), which are culture negative, were unresolved by the GeneOhm-MRSA. With regard to the patients, seven were detected as MRSA carriers only by the GeneOhm-MRSA while one patient was tested positive for MRSA only by culture. Assuming 100% correct results by the culture method, sensitivity and specificity of GeneOhm-MRSA assay could be calculated as 84.4% and 96.1% for nasal swabs, 78.7% and 96.9% for all swabs under study, and 94.8% and 99.5% when focussed on patients. PPV and NPV were 70.3% and 98% for all specimens together, respectively. BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay is a sensitive test for the detection of MRSA colonization from swab specimens without the need for an initial culture, but should always be performed in parallel to the culture method for comparison reasons. Furthermore, our results indicate that in addition swabs taken from different body sites were successfully analysed by the BD GeneOhm-MRSA assay. However, we conclude that the PCR assay might not be a preferred tool for screening in haematologic patients with low MRSA rate; for screening haematologic patients, the culture method is sufficient enough.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.