Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516708›Full record

ArticleGut and liver2014

Is a preoperative assessment of the early recurrence of pancreatic cancer possible after complete surgical resection?

Marco La Torre, Giuseppe Nigri, Annalisa Lo Conte, Federica Mazzuca, Simone Maria Tierno, Adelona Salaj, Paolo Marchetti, Vincenzo Ziparo, Giovanni Ramacciato

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut and liver, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco La TorreDepartment of General Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe NigriDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Annalisa Lo ConteDepartment of General Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Federica MazzucaDepartment of Oncology, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Simone Maria TiernoDepartment of General Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Adelona SalajDepartment of General Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiDepartment of Oncology, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo ZiparoDepartment of General Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni RamacciatoDepartment of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Biomedical Technologies and Translational Medicine, St. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is poor. The serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level has been identified as a prognostic indicator of recurrence and reduced overall survival. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative prognostic factors and to create a prognostic model able to assess the early recurrence risk for patients with resectable PAC.

methodsA series of 177 patients with PAC treated surgically at the St. Andrea Hospital of Rome between January 2003 and December 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to identify preoperative prognostic indicators.

resultsA preoperative CA 19-9 level >228 U/mL, tumor size >3.1 cm, and the presence of pathological preoperative lymph nodes statistically correlated with early recurrence. Together, these three factors predicted the possibility of an early recurrence with 90.4% accuracy. The combination of these three preoperative conditions was identified as an independent parameter for early recurrence based on multivariate analysis (p=0.0314; hazard ratio, 3.9811; 95% confidence interval, 1.1745 to 15.3245).

conclusionsPAC patient candidates for surgical resection should undergo an assessment of early recurrence risk to avoid unnecessary and ineffective resection and to identify patients for whom palliative or alternative treatment may be the treatment of choice.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdenocarcinomaAgedBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenEarly recurrencePancreatic adenocarcinomaPancreatic neoplasmsPreoperative CA 19-9Prognosis

Identifiers

PMID24516708
PMCPMC3916679
OpenAlexW2021410785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.