Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516686›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

No evidence for lymphatic filariasis transmission in big cities affected by conflict related rural-urban migration in Sierra Leone and Liberia.

Dziedzom K de Souza, Santigie Sesay, Marnijina G Moore, Rashid Ansumana, Charles A Narh, Karsor Kollie, Maria P Rebollo, Benjamin G Koudou, Joseph B Koroma, Fatorma K Bolay and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Threat of Vector-Borne Diseases in Sierra Leone.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessing the Presence ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dziedzom K de SouzaNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Santigie SesayMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Marnijina G MooreMinistry of Health and Social Welfare, Monrovia, Liberia.
Rashid AnsumanaMercy Hospital Research Laboratory, Bo, Sierra Leone ; Centre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Charles A NarhNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Karsor KollieMinistry of Health and Social Welfare, Monrovia, Liberia.
Maria P RebolloCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Benjamin G KoudouCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Joseph B KoromaCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fatorma K BolayLiberian Institute for Biomedical Research, Charlesville, Liberia.
Daniel A BoakyeNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Moses J BockarieCentre for Neglected Tropical Diseases, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn West Africa, the principal vectors of lymphatic filariasis (LF) are Anopheles species with Culex species playing only a minor role in transmission, if any. Being a predominantly rural disease, the question remains whether conflict-related migration of rural populations into urban areas would be sufficient for active transmission of the parasite. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe examined LF transmission in urban areas in post-conflict Sierra Leone and Liberia that experienced significant rural-urban migration. Mosquitoes from Freetown and Monrovia, were analyzed for infection with Wuchereria bancrofti. We also undertook a transmission assessment survey (TAS) in Bo and Pujehun districts in Sierra Leone. The majority of the mosquitoes collected were Culex species, while Anopheles species were present in low numbers. The mosquitoes were analyzed in pools, with a maximum of 20 mosquitoes per pool. In both countries, a total of 1731 An. gambiae and 14342 Culex were analyzed for W. bancrofti, using the PCR. Two pools of Culex mosquitoes and 1 pool of An. gambiae were found infected from one community in Freetown. Pool screening analysis indicated a maximum likelihood of infection of 0.004 (95% CI of 0.00012-0.021) and 0.015 (95% CI of 0.0018-0.052) for the An. gambiae and Culex respectively. The results indicate that An. gambiae is present in low numbers, with a microfilaria prevalence breaking threshold value not sufficient to maintain transmission. The results of the TAS in Bo and Pujehun also indicated an antigen prevalence of 0.19% and 0.67% in children, respectively. This is well below the recommended 2% level for stopping MDA in Anopheles transmission areas, according to WHO guidelines.

conclusionsWe found no evidence for active transmission of LF in cities, where internally displaced persons from rural areas lived for many years during the more than 10 years conflict in Sierra Leone and Liberia.

Indexed as

WarfareAnimalsAnophelesCitiesCulexElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleHumansInsect VectorsLiberiaMalePopulation DynamicsRural PopulationSierra LeoneWuchereria bancrofti

Identifiers

PMID24516686
PMCPMC3916318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.