Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Benefits, barriers and enablers of breastfeeding: factor analysis of population perceptions in Western Australia.

Alison Daly, Christina Mary Pollard, Michael Phillips, Colin William Binns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How Knowledge about Stem Cells Influences Attitudes towards Breastfeeding: Case Study of Polish Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about Exclusive Breastfeeding among Women in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison DalySchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Christina Mary PollardSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia ; Department of Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Michael PhillipsHarry Perkins Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Colin William BinnsSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate knowledge and community perceptions of breastfeeding in Western Australia using a factor analysis approach.

methodsData were pooled from five Nutrition Monitoring Survey Series which included information on breastfeeding from 4,802 Western Australian adults aged 18-64 years. Tetrachoric factor analysis was conducted for data reduction and significant associations identified using logistic, ordinal and poisson regression analyses.

resultsFour factors were derived for benefits (it's natural, good nutrition, good for the baby, and convenience), barriers (breastfeeding problems, poor community acceptability, having to go back to work, and inconvenience) and for enablers (breastfeeding education, community support, family support and not having to work). As assessed by standardized odds ratios the most important covariates across benefit factors were: importance of breastfeeding (ORs range from 1.22-1.44), female gender (ORs range from 0.80 to 1.46), being able to give a time for how long a baby should be breastfed (ORs range from 0.96 to 1.27) and education (less than high school to university completion) (ORs range from 0.95 to 1.23); the most important covariate across barrier factors was being able to give a time for how long a baby should be breastfed (ORs range from 0.89 to 1.93); and the most important covariates across all enabling factors were education (ORs range from 1.14 to 1.32) and being able to give a time for how long a baby should be breastfed (ORs range from 1.17 to 1.42).

conclusionsBeing female, rating breastfeeding as important, believing that babies should be breastfed for a period of time and education accounted for most of the statistically significant associations. The differences between male and female perceptions require investigation particularly in relation to returning to work.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionPerceptionAdolescentAdultBreast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMothersSex FactorsWestern AustraliaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24516612
PMCPMC3917871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.