Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516544›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A deterministic analysis of genome integrity during neoplastic growth in Drosophila.

Cem Sievers, Federico Comoglio, Makiko Seimiya, Gunter Merdes, Renato Paro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Apoptosis inhibition restrains primary malignant traits in differentFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cem SieversDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.
Federico ComoglioDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.
Makiko SeimiyaDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.
Gunter MerdesDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Basel, Switzerland.
Renato ParoDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Basel, Switzerland ; Faculty of Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of cancer has been associated with the gradual acquisition of genetic alterations leading to a progressive increase in malignancy. In various cancer types this process is enabled and accelerated by genome instability. While genome sequencing-based analysis of tumor genomes becomes increasingly a standard procedure in human cancer research, the potential necessity of genome instability for tumorigenesis in Drosophila melanogaster has, to our knowledge, never been determined at DNA sequence level. Therefore, we induced formation of tumors by depletion of the Drosophila tumor suppressor Polyhomeotic and subjected them to genome sequencing. To achieve a highly resolved delineation of the genome structure we developed the Deterministic Structural Variation Detection (DSVD) algorithm, which identifies structural variations (SVs) with high accuracy and at single base resolution. The employment of long overlapping paired-end reads enables DSVD to perform a deterministic, i.e. fragment size distribution independent, identification of a large size spectrum of SVs. Application of DSVD and other algorithms to our sequencing data reveals substantial genetic variation with respect to the reference genome reflecting temporal separation of the reference and laboratory strains. The majority of SVs, constituted by small insertions/deletions, is potentially caused by erroneous replication or transposition of mobile elements. Nevertheless, the tumor did not depict a loss of genome integrity compared to the control. Altogether, our results demonstrate that genome stability is not affected inevitably during sustained tumor growth in Drosophila implying that tumorigenesis, in this model organism, can occur irrespective of genome instability and the accumulation of specific genetic alterations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomic InstabilityAnimalsCell ProliferationComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterEpitheliumGenetic VariationGenome, InsectHumansNeoplasmsOpen Reading FramesReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNAZygote

Identifiers

PMID24516544
PMCPMC3916295
OpenAlexW1963506263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.