Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516292›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India2013

Scar revision.

Mohit Sharma, Abhijeet Wakure

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Insights on in-office scar revision and resurfacing procedures.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Scar Revisions.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2021
    Review
  12. Mechanotransduction in Wound Healing and Fibrosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohit SharmaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Abhijeet WakureDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most surgical patients end up with a scar and most of these would want at least some improvement in the appearance of the scar. Using sound techniques for wound closure surgeons can, to a certain extent, prevent suboptimal scars. This article reviews the principles of prevention and treatment of suboptimal scars. Surgical techniques of scar revision, i.e., Z plasty, W plasty, and geometrical broken line closure are described. Post-operative care and other adjuvant therapies of scars are described. A short description of dermabrasion and lasers for management of scars is given. It is hoped that this review helps the surgeon to formulate a comprehensive plan for management of scars of these patients.

Indexed as

scar adjunct therapyscar managementSuboptimal scarsurgical scar revision

Identifiers

PMID24516292
PMCPMC3901922
OpenAlexW4230742290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.