Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24516161›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Morphogenesis at criticality.

Dmitry Krotov, Julien O Dubuis, Thomas Gregor, William Bialek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamical systems of fate and form in development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Quantifying the genetic origins of body plan scaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Stochastic morphological swings inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Deriving a genetic regulatory network from an optimization principle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Scale invariance in early embryonic development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Growth couples temporal and spatial fluctuations of tissue properties during morphogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Proliferating active matter.Nature reviews. Physics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Latent space of a small genetic network: Geometry of dynamics and information.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Sculpting tissues by phase transitions.Nature communications · 2022
    Review
  20. Microenvironment-mediated cancer dormancy: Insights from metastability theory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dmitry KrotovJoseph Henry Laboratories of Physics, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Julien O Dubuis
Thomas Gregor
William Bialek

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
The Biophysical and Molecular Mechanisms of Reliability in DevelopmentR01GM097275 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI GREGOR, THOMAS · 2011 to 2024
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial patterns in the early fruit fly embryo emerge from a network of interactions among transcription factors, the gap genes, driven by maternal inputs. Such networks can exhibit many qualitatively different behaviors, separated by critical surfaces. At criticality, we should observe strong correlations in the fluctuations of different genes around their mean expression levels, a slowing of the dynamics along some but not all directions in the space of possible expression levels, correlations of expression fluctuations over long distances in the embryo, and departures from a Gaussian distribution of these fluctuations. Analysis of recent experiments on the gap gene network shows that all these signatures are observed, and that the different signatures are related in ways predicted by theory. Although there might be other explanations for these individual phenomena, the confluence of evidence suggests that this genetic network is tuned to criticality.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMorphogenesisThermodynamicsTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinshb protein, DrosophilaKr protein, DrosophilaKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsDrosophila embryogenetic networks

Identifiers

PMID24516161
PMCPMC3956198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.